Difficulty of Discrimination Modulates Attentional Capture by Regulating Attentional Focus

Attentional capture for distractors is enhanced by increasing the difficulty of discrimination between the standard and the target in the three-stimulus oddball paradigm. In this study, we investigated the cognitive mechanism of this modulation of attentional capture. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from participants while they performed a visual three-stimulus oddball paradigm (frequent standard, rare target, and rare distractor). The discrimination difficulty between standard and target was manipulated in the central location. Distractor stimuli were presented in the central or surrounding locations. The P3a component was elicited by distractor stimuli and was used as a measure of attentional capture. The results revealed that discrimination difficulty had opposite effects on the P3a response between central and surrounding locations. With an increase in the difficulty of discrimination, the P3a response was enhanced when distractor stimuli were presented in the central location. In contrast, the P3a response was reduced when distractor stimuli were presented in a surrounding location. This finding suggests that spatial attention was focused by the difficulty of discrimination, and deviant processing was increased within its focus but decreased outside its focus. Therefore, attentional capture for deviant distractors is modulated by top–down controlled attentional focus.

[1]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The Influence of Stimulus Deviance on Electrophysiologic and Behavioral Responses to Novel Events , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  R. Simons,et al.  On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3 , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[5]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[9]  A. Engel,et al.  What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  B Giesbrecht,et al.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  R. Knight Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  R. J. Doherty,et al.  Separation of the components of the late positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S A Hillyard,et al.  P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. Polich Theoretical Overview of P3a and P3b , 2003 .

[21]  E. N. Solokov Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[22]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  J. Polich,et al.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[24]  J. Polich,et al.  Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[26]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[27]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Wavelet Analysis of P3a and P3b , 2004, Brain Topography.

[28]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[32]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  John Polich,et al.  P3a from auditory white noise stimuli , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  E Courchesne,et al.  Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. , 1990, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[36]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a from Visual Stimuli: Typicality, Task, and Topography , 2004, Brain Topography.

[38]  Brian A. Lopez,et al.  P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[40]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  G. Shulman,et al.  Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Can new objects override attentional control settings? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  William S Maki,et al.  Attentional capture triggers an attentional blink , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  R. Knight Distributed Cortical Network for Visual Attention , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[49]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[51]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[53]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  J. Ford,et al.  Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[55]  E. Donchin,et al.  Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[56]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[58]  J. Nigg,et al.  Disinhibition and borderline personality disorder , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[59]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  J. Nigg,et al.  An integrative theory of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder based on the cognitive and affective neurosciences , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[61]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[63]  G. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[64]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Temporal attentional capture: Effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  E. Donchin,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[69]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Severity of AD/HD symptoms and efficiency of attentional resource allocation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[70]  J. Theeuwes Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[71]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[74]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[75]  Adam Reeves,et al.  Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[76]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Attention and Sensory Gain Control: A Peripheral Visual Process? , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[77]  G. Mangun,et al.  Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[78]  R. Verleger On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[79]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[80]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[81]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: an event‐related potential study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[84]  J. Polich,et al.  Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[85]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[86]  J. Polich,et al.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[87]  J. Polich,et al.  P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[88]  E. Donchin,et al.  The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[89]  Jun'ichi Katayama,et al.  Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information. , 2007, Psychophysiology.