Relational asymmetry, trust, and innovation in supply chain management: a non-linear approach

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the non-linear aspects of the asymmetry-performance relationship under varying conditions of trust and innovation. Its novel approach is useful for addressing the strategic elements of supply chain management (SCM) relationships based on trust and innovation decisions. Design/methodology/approach Results are based on a study of 90 managers from small- and medium-sized firms in Spain. Instead of a classical linear relationship analysis, the authors performed a non-linear analysis, using polynomial modeling and Warp 3 partial least squares method, which provides a more nuanced view of the data and constitutes an original approach to empirical research in SCM. Findings This study adds a new viewpoint on SC relationships by suggesting that not all trust and innovation development leads directly to performance improvement. The principal finding is, in varying trust and innovation contexts, that the influences of asymmetry on performance have uneven characteristics and follow non-linear paths. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on only one particular institutional environment in one country. The data are also cross-sectional, which makes it difficult to empirically test causality. Practical implications The findings provide rational insights to managers on when it is appropriate to reduce (or not) asymmetric relationships with partners. Originality/value Trust and innovation are important and ones of the key requirements of supply chain relationships in any environment, this study argues that the interactions of key SCM elements that drive members to better performance are more complex and non-linear.

[1]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Making More by Doing Less: An Analysis of Outsourcing and its Effects on Firm Performance , 2000 .

[2]  J. Holmström,et al.  Using value reengineering to implement breakthrough solutions for customers , 1999 .

[3]  Steven B. Lyman,et al.  Supply chain management: a strategic perspective , 2002 .

[4]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  ALLIANCES IN INDUSTRIAL PURCHASING - THE DETERMINANTS OF JOINT ACTION IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[5]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning , 2001 .

[6]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Risky business: expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise , 2004 .

[7]  Hoda Davarzani,et al.  Toward a relevant agenda for warehousing research: literature review and practitioners’ input , 2015, Logist. Res..

[8]  M. Fesharaki,et al.  The relationship between mediated power asymmetry, relational risk perception, and governance mechanism in new product development relationships , 2010 .

[9]  J. Edwards The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[10]  Chun-Hsiung Liao,et al.  Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation and firm performance in container shipping firms , 2015 .

[11]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities , 2013 .

[12]  Terry L. Esper,et al.  Exploring relational asymmetry in supply chains: the retailer's perspective , 2010 .

[13]  Göran Svensson,et al.  Perceived trust towards suppliers and customers in supply chains of the Swedish automotive industry , 2001 .

[14]  B. Tether Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[15]  J. Ramsay The Resource Based Perspective, Rents, and Purchasing's Contribution to Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2001 .

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[17]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[18]  S. Hung,et al.  Social Capital and Creativity in R&D Project Teams , 2007 .

[19]  D. Ford,et al.  How should companies interact in business networks , 2002 .

[20]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[22]  Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn,et al.  Exploring supply chain innovation , 2011, Logist. Res..

[23]  J. Salo,et al.  Cognitive barriers to collaborative innovation generation in supply chain relationships , 2017 .

[24]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Trust‐opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry , 2008 .

[25]  Ramaswami Sridharan,et al.  Design for supply chain collaboration , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research , 2014 .

[27]  Togar M. Simatupang,et al.  Supply chain discontent , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  J. Edwards,et al.  Job demands and worker health: three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[30]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Contingency research in operations management practices , 2008 .

[31]  Leslie Brokaw,et al.  Does sustainability change the talent equation , 2009 .

[32]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[33]  Verónica H. Villena,et al.  On the Same Page? How Asymmetric Buyer–Supplier Relationships Affect Opportunism and Performance , 2017 .

[34]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Brian S. Fugate,et al.  Linking improved knowledge management to operational and organizational performance , 2009 .

[36]  David Walters,et al.  Cooperative innovation: a value chain approach , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[37]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Contingency Fit, Institutional Fit, and Firm Performance: A Metafit Approach to Organization-Environment Relationships , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Miriam Wilhelm,et al.  Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis , 2011 .

[39]  Liang Tang,et al.  Complex interdependent supply chain networks: Cascading failure and robustness , 2016 .

[40]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  Implementing sustainability on a corporate and a functional level: Key contingencies that influence the required coordination , 2014 .

[41]  Michael Pitt,et al.  The application of supply chain management and collaborative innovation in the delivery of facilities management services , 2009 .

[42]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[43]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  The “dark side” of institutional trust , 2016 .

[44]  Amydee M. Fawcett,et al.  PEEKING INSIDE THE BLACK BOX: TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION DYNAMICS , 2012 .

[45]  A. Moreira,et al.  The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review , 2016 .

[46]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Managing Differentiation-Integration Duality in Supply Chain Integration , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[47]  Sally Atkinson,et al.  Trust in managerial relationships , 2003 .

[48]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D: a game-theoretic approach , 2007 .

[49]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Optimizing success in supply chain partnerships , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[50]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  Bundling for B2B procurement auctions: Current state and best practices , 2006 .

[51]  N. Coviello,et al.  Growing the entrepreneurial firm , 1995 .

[52]  Marek Michalski,et al.  Trust and it Innovation in Asymmetric Environments of the Supply Chain Management Process , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 1996 .

[54]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  The antecedent role of quality, information sharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance , 2005 .

[55]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Can small firms gain relational advantage? Exploring strategic choice and trustworthiness signals in supply chain relationships , 2014 .

[56]  Hugh Wilson,et al.  The governance of supply networks: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[57]  Li-Ling Hsu,et al.  SCM system effects on performance for interaction between suppliers and buyers , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[58]  Chieh-Yu Lin Determinants of the adoption of technological innovations by logistics service providers in China , 2008 .

[59]  B. S. Sahay,et al.  Supply chain partners' trust building process through risk evaluation: the perspectives of UAE packaged food industry , 2009 .

[60]  K. Lai,et al.  Linking inter-organizational trust with logistics information integration and partner cooperation under environmental uncertainty , 2012 .

[61]  L. Skinner,et al.  Total Trust and Trust Asymmetry: Does Trust Need to Be Equally Distributed in Interfirm Relationships? , 2010 .

[62]  Richard Cuthbertson,et al.  Performance measurement systems in supply chains: A framework for contextual analysis , 2011 .

[63]  Daniel F. Lynch,et al.  Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner , 2013 .

[64]  D. Towill,et al.  Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements , 2000 .

[65]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  A performance comparison tool for supply chain management , 2006 .

[66]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  The Contingency Theory of Organizational Design: Challenges and Opportunities , 2006 .

[67]  Mohammed Laeequddin,et al.  Journal of Management Development Emerald Article: Trust building in supply chain partners relationship: an integrated conceptual model , 2012 .

[68]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Supply chain design: issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions , 2014 .

[69]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes , 1995 .

[70]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ , 2011 .

[71]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Perspectives on Supply Network–Enabled Innovations , 2013 .

[72]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[73]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[74]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[75]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships , 1998 .

[76]  R. Gulati,et al.  Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer's Performance in Procurement Relationships , 2007 .

[77]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  Horizontal cooperations between logistics service providers: motives, structure, performance , 2011 .

[78]  Maria Colurcio,et al.  Collaborative Innovation — A Focus on Food SMES , 2013 .

[79]  Peter Barrett,et al.  Achieving strategic facilities management through strong relationships , 2000 .

[80]  Antonio Capaldo Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[81]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Supply chain evolution – theory, concepts and science , 2016 .

[82]  Yanheng Liu,et al.  Building a trusted route in a mobile ad hoc network considering communication reliability and path length , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[83]  T. Skjøtt-Larsen,et al.  Complementary theories to supply chain management , 2007 .

[84]  M. Cao,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance , 2011 .

[85]  R. Bouncken Supply Chain Contingencies: The Effects of Up-Stream Directives on Supplier's Innovation Performance , 2011 .

[86]  I. Chen,et al.  Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework , 2004 .

[87]  Les James Feldman,et al.  Industry viewpoint: relational interdependency and punctuated equilibrium , 1998 .

[88]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  E XPECTATION D ISCONFIRMATION AND T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION : P OLYNOMIAL M ODELING AND R ESPONSE S URFACE A NALYSIS 1 , 2010 .

[89]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[90]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[91]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Initial trust and online buyer behaviour , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[92]  S. Seuring,et al.  Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews , 2014 .

[93]  Amydee M. Fawcett,et al.  Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation , 2012 .

[94]  Kangkang Yu,et al.  Fits and misfits of supply chain flexibility to environmental uncertainty: Two types of asymmetric effects on performance , 2016 .

[95]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  Jeffrey A. Ogden,et al.  Organizational commitment and governance for supply chain success , 2006 .

[97]  Soon Hong Min,et al.  The moderating role of trust in manufacturer‐supplier relationships , 2007 .

[98]  Stanley E. Griffis,et al.  WEB‐BASED AND MAIL SURVEYS: A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE, DATA, AND COST , 2003 .

[99]  Morgan Swink,et al.  EFFECTS OF MARKETING-MANUFACTURING INTEGRATION ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TIME AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2007 .

[100]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Bright Side and Dark Side of Embedded Ties in Business-to-Business Innovation , 2011 .

[101]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Trust development and horizontal collaboration in logistics: a theory based evolutionary framework , 2015 .

[102]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  Collaborative supply chain network using embedded genetic algorithms , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[103]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[104]  Rhona E. Johnsen,et al.  Exploring the concept of asymmetry: A typology for analysing customer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[105]  Sung Kook Park,et al.  Inter-organizational cooperation in buyer–supplier relationships: Both perspectives , 2010 .

[106]  Amydee M. Fawcett,et al.  I know it when I see it: the nature of trust, trustworthiness signals, and strategic trust construction , 2017 .

[107]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? , 2015 .

[108]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry , 2011 .

[109]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  Operational Governance in Horizontal Cooperations of Logistics Service Providers: Performance Effects and the Moderating Role of Cooperation Complexity , 2012 .

[110]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[111]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .