What Types of Statements are There?

Building on the work of Sproule, Fahnestock and Secor, and Kruger, we present a specific typology of statements. In particular, we distinguish broadly logically determinate statements, descriptions, interpretations, and evaluations. We generate this typology through a series of dichotomous divisions of statements. We divide statements first into the broadly logically determinate versus contingent, the contingent into the evaluational versus natural, and the natural into the extensional versus intensional. We show that the rationales for these distinctions are well motivated and philosophically important. In particular, we argue that identifying the type of a statement is relevant to showing whether or not the sources vouching for it render the statement epistemically acceptable.

[1]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .

[2]  B. Skyrms Choice and chance : an introduction to inductive logic , 1968 .

[3]  Arthur N. Kruger,et al.  The Nature of Controversial Statements. , 1975 .

[4]  D. S. Clarke Rational acceptance and purpose : an outline of a pragmatist epistemology , 1989 .

[5]  R. Carnap Meaning and necessity : a study in semantics and modal logic , 1948 .

[6]  DeWitt H. Parker,et al.  Ethics and Language. , 1946 .

[7]  A. Damasio Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[8]  Keith ed Lehrer,et al.  Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays , 1975 .

[9]  The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. , 1986 .

[10]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Philosophy of Logic. , 1988 .

[11]  P. Skagestad The road of inquiry, Charles Peirce's pragmatic realism , 1981 .

[12]  T. Govier A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[13]  E. Nagel The structure of science : problems in the logic of scientific explanation , 1961 .

[14]  James F. Wilson The Moral Sense , 1994 .

[15]  Aristotle,et al.  The Basic Works of Aristotle , 1941 .

[16]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[17]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[18]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  The Logic of Causal Propositions. , 1951 .

[19]  Hilary Kornblith,et al.  Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology , 1993 .

[20]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[21]  John Nolt Informal Logic: Possible Worlds and Imagination , 1984 .

[22]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .

[23]  W. Quine Ontological Relativity and Other Essays , 1969 .

[24]  Charles B. Daniels,et al.  An analysis of the subjunctive conditional , 1980, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  An essay on belief and acceptance , 1994 .

[26]  B. Brody,et al.  Thomas Reid's Inquiry , 1976 .

[27]  Ralph H. Johnson,et al.  Argumentation as dialectical , 1987 .

[28]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[29]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[30]  W. G. Maclagan Respect for Persons as a Moral Principle—Part I , 1960, Philosophy.

[31]  H. J. Paton,et al.  The moral law : Kant's groundwork of the metaphysic of morals , 1950 .

[32]  THEORY, COMMON SENSE AND CERTAINTY , 1981 .

[33]  C. A. J. Coady,et al.  Testimony: A Philosophical Study. , 1994 .

[34]  Charlotte L. Stough Greek Skepticism: A Study in Epistemology , 1969 .

[35]  Argument: Language and its influence , 1980 .

[36]  D. D. Raphael,et al.  The Moral Sense , 1915, American Political Science Review.

[37]  Arthur W. Burks,et al.  VIII.—THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL PROPOSITIONS , 1951 .

[38]  E. Conee The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification , 1988 .

[39]  Jeanne Fahnestock,et al.  A Rhetoric of Argument , 1982 .

[40]  J. Searle Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[41]  René Descartes,et al.  Discourse on Method and Meditations , 1960 .

[42]  Edmund L. Gettier Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? , 1963, Arguing About Knowledge.

[43]  C. Peirce,et al.  Philosophical Writings of Peirce , 1955 .

[44]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason , 1988 .

[45]  D L Medin,et al.  Concepts and conceptual structure. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[46]  Terry J. Christlieb,et al.  The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. , 1987 .

[47]  Alvin Plantinga,et al.  Warrant: The Current Debate , 1993 .

[48]  T. Govier Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation , 2018 .

[49]  J. Sproule The psychological burden of proof: On the evolutionary development of Richard Whately's theory of presumption , 1976 .

[50]  P. Laplace A Philosophical Essay On Probabilities , 1902 .

[51]  Epistemic justification and premise acceptability , 1996 .

[52]  William P. Alston,et al.  Concepts of Epistemic Justification , 1985 .

[53]  Brooke Noel Moore Critical thinking : evaluating claims and arguments in everyday life / Brooke Noel Moore, Richard Parker , 1986 .

[54]  M. Beardsley Thinking Straight; Principles of Reasoning for Readers and Writers , 1975 .

[55]  Alvin Plantinga Warrant and proper function , 1993 .

[56]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Burden of proof , 1988 .

[57]  W. D. Ross,et al.  The Right and the Good , 1930 .

[58]  John Nolt Possible Worlds and Imagination in Informal Logic , 1984 .

[59]  D. Medin,et al.  Comments on part I: psychological essentialism , 1989 .

[60]  R. Firth Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts , 1978 .

[61]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .