The Link between Local Production Systems and Public and University Research in Italy

Small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) are increasingly regarded as engines of innovative activity, especially in some of the most dynamic local areas in Western Europe. However, most SMEs lack the adequate resources to conduct research and development (R&D), which is traditionally considered as the main source of innovation. This apparent contradiction has induced several researchers to try to answer the question of where SMEs get their knowledge inputs. This literature, which has tended to use patents as a proxy for public research, has found that SMEs are particularly sensitive to spillovers from university and public research. In this paper the authors readdress this question by using a bibliometric indicator of public research output, instead of patents, for 100 Italian provinces during the 1990s. The results highlight that there is a strong geographical connection between the territorial concentration of SMEs and public research and that this connection is sensitive to firm size.

[1]  Colin Crouch,et al.  Local Production Systems in Europe: Rise or Demise? , 2001 .

[2]  Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al.  Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence , 2001 .

[3]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[4]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Smfs inter firm relationships and technological change , 1989 .

[5]  Paul Foley,et al.  PRODUCTION SITE R&D IN A MATURE INDUSTRIAL REGION , 1996 .

[6]  G. Santangelo,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Attractiveness in the EU Integration Process , 2000 .

[7]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[8]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Low-Tech Competitive Advantages and the Role Of Proximity , 1998 .

[9]  M. Storper.  The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade , 1992 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation , 2004 .

[11]  Roberta Capello,et al.  Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[12]  T. Kealey.  Why science is endogenous: a debate with Paul David (and Ben Martin, Paul Romer, Chris Freeman, Luc Soete and Keith Pavitt) , 1998 .

[13]  Frank Wilkinson,et al.  Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe , 1999 .

[14]  Annette Winkel Schwarz,et al.  Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators , 1999 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[16]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[17]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[18]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy , 1996 .

[19]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle , 1995 .

[20]  Manufacturing Productivity Growth across European Union States: 1978 – 94 , 2001 .

[21]  C. Trigilia.  Sviluppo senza autonomia : effetti perversi delle politiche nel Mezzogiorno , 1992 .

[22]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[23]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[24]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity , 1999 .

[25]  Greg Clark,et al.  Investing Partners: Further Education, Economic Development and Regional Policy. , 1997 .

[26]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[27]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[28]  Barry Moore,et al.  Collective Learning Processes, Networking and 'Institutional Thickness' in the Cambridge Region , 1999 .

[29]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[30]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[31]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[32]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order , 1999 .

[33]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe , 1999 .

[34]  P. Bonavero.  Local Production Systems in Europe: Rise or Demise? , 2003 .

[35]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[36]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies , 1992 .

[37]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[38]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[39]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  From Which Source Do Small Firms Derive Their Innovative Inputs? Some Evidence from Italian Industry , 1997 .

[40]  W. Fox,et al.  Local Public Policies and Interregional Business Development , 1990 .

[41]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[42]  T. Bartik.  Small Business Start-ups in the United States: Estimates of the Effects of Characteristics of States , 1989 .

[43]  F. Martin,et al.  The economic impact of Canadian university R&D , 1998 .

[44]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[45]  D. Keeble,et al.  New Firms, Small Firms and Dead Firms: Spatial Patterns and Determinants in the United Kingdom , 1994 .

[46]  D. Keeble,et al.  University–business interaction in the Oxford and Cambridge regions , 2001 .