Prediction models in obstetrics: understanding the treatment paradox and potential solutions to the threat it poses

the treatment paradox and potential solutions to the threat it poses F Cheong-See, J Allotey, N Marlin, BW Mol, E Schuit, G ter Riet, RD Riley, KGM Moons, KS Khan, S Thangaratinam a Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK b Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, UK c Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK d Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia e Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands f Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA g Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands h Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK Correspondence: Prof S Thangaratinam, Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK. Email s.thangaratinam@qmul.ac.uk

[1]  Martha Sajatovic,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models , 2013 .

[2]  M. Cowie National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. , 2015, European heart journal.

[3]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Prognostic factors in the prediction of chronic wound healing by electrical stimulation , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  J. Concato,et al.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  J. Hutcheon,et al.  Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model , 2011, The Lancet.

[6]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Unexpected predictor–outcome associations in clinical prediction research: causes and solutions , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[8]  J. Spertus,et al.  Pre-procedural estimate of individualized bleeding risk impacts physicians' utilization of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  W. Grove,et al.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological assessment.

[10]  A. Gülmezoglu,et al.  Anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  F. Rutten,et al.  Development and validation of a model to predict the risk of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2013, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[13]  D. Mark,et al.  Clinical prediction models: are we building better mousetraps? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.