Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use

Policy-makers apply multiple policy instruments simultaneously in the climate and energy policy field at both EU and Member State levels. This creates interactions between instruments that can be complementary and synergistic but also conflicting. This article focuses on the interactions of climate policy instruments and their impact on biomass use. The objectives are to examine interactions of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) with the main national climate policy instruments and to identify the influence of these on biomass use. The work draws experiences from seven EU countries (Austria, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom), with a special focus on Finland and Sweden. The analysis explores the effects of policy interactions and is based on an examination of literature, and interviews with biomass experts in research, industry and policy spheres. Results indicate that the combined effects of climate policy instruments have a tangible impact on biomass use, whereas the causal links to the EU ETS are difficult to assess separately. Policy impacts found include increased competition for biomass resources, changes in fuel mixes and a contribution to upward pressure on wood prices. Differences in these effects are linked to differing national policy mixes and energy-carrier portfolios – an example being the relative differences in the importance of peat to the energy mix in Finland and Sweden. Analysis and comparison of the effects in the selected countries can yield insight on how to improve the design of policy interventions that impact biomass use. This study confirms the importance of identifying interactions between policy instruments so as to recognise – and manage – synergies and conflicts. The development of more synergistic and coordinated policy instrument mixes would also be beneficial for the bioenergy field.

[1]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergi: Resurseffektivitet och bidrag till energi- och klimatpolitiska mål. , 2007 .

[2]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Carbon trading in the policy mix , 2003 .

[3]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  White certificate schemes: Economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS , 2009 .

[4]  Peter Lund,et al.  Effectiveness of policy measures in transforming the energy system , 2007 .

[5]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy expansion in the EU: Cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels , 2007 .

[6]  Jean-Philippe Barde,et al.  Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy: Lessons from the OECD Experience and their Relevance to Developing Economies , 1994 .

[7]  Bo Ryden Towards a Sustainable Nordic Energy System.20 Perspectives on Nordic Energy10 Opportunities and Challenges. , 2010 .

[8]  Naomi Pena,et al.  The future European Emission Trading Scheme and its impact on biomass use. , 2012 .

[9]  D. Harrison,et al.  Interactions of the EU ETS with Green And White Certificate Schemes: European Commission Directorate-General Environment , 2005 .

[10]  Jan Abrell,et al.  The Interaction of Emissions Trading and Renewable Energy Promotion , 2008 .

[11]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments , 2007 .

[12]  Other Renewable energy: market and policy trends in IEA countries , 2004 .

[13]  Jos Sijm The interaction between the EU emissions trading scheme and national energy policies , 2005 .

[14]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature , 2007 .

[15]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .