Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression to Study Lineage Specification in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos.

This protocol presents a method to perform quantitative, single-cell in situ analyses of protein expression to study lineage specification in mouse preimplantation embryos. The procedures necessary for embryo collection, immunofluorescence, imaging on a confocal microscope, and image segmentation and analysis are described. This method allows quantitation of the expression of multiple nuclear markers and the spatial (XYZ) coordinates of all cells in the embryo. It takes advantage of MINS, an image segmentation software tool specifically developed for the analysis of confocal images of preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cell (ESC) colonies. MINS carries out unsupervised nuclear segmentation across the X, Y and Z dimensions, and produces information on cell position in three-dimensional space, as well as nuclear fluorescence levels for all channels with minimal user input. While this protocol has been optimized for the analysis of images of preimplantation stage mouse embryos, it can easily be adapted to the analysis of any other samples exhibiting a good signal-to-noise ratio and where high nuclear density poses a hurdle to image segmentation (e.g., expression analysis of embryonic stem cell (ESC) colonies, differentiating cells in culture, embryos of other species or stages, etc.).

[1]  T P Fleming,et al.  A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[2]  M. Ashburner A Laboratory manual , 1989 .

[3]  K. Nacerddine,et al.  Impaired Mitotic Progression and Preimplantation Lethality in Mice Lacking OMCG1, a New Evolutionarily Conserved Nuclear Protein , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[5]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Dynamic expression of Lrp2 pathway members reveals progressive epithelial differentiation of primitive endoderm in mouse blastocyst. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[6]  Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis,et al.  Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst , 2008, Development.

[7]  J. Nichols,et al.  Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo , 2009, Development.

[8]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Janet Rossant,et al.  FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst , 2010, Development.

[10]  A. Hadjantonakis,et al.  A role for PDGF signaling in expansion of the extra-embryonic endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst , 2010, Development.

[11]  Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis,et al.  The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[12]  B. Płusa,et al.  Early cell fate decisions in the mouse embryo. , 2013, Reproduction.

[13]  Minjung Kang,et al.  FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse , 2013, Development.

[14]  N. Papalopulu,et al.  Atypical protein kinase C couples cell sorting with primitive endoderm maturation in the mouse blastocyst , 2013, Development.

[15]  Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis,et al.  Anatomy of a blastocyst: Cell behaviors driving cell fate choice and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo , 2013, Genesis.

[16]  G. Shaw,et al.  Early cell lineage specification in a marsupial: a case for diverse mechanisms among mammals , 2013, Development.

[17]  J. Nichols,et al.  Oct4 is required for lineage priming in the developing inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst , 2014, Development.

[18]  A. Hadjantonakis,et al.  GATA6 levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse blastocyst. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[19]  Minjung Kang,et al.  Stem Cell Reports , Volume 2 Supplemental Information A Rapid and Efficient 2 D / 3 D Nuclear Segmentation Method for Analysis of Early Mouse Embryo and Stem Cell Image Data , 2014 .

[20]  A. Czechanski,et al.  Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[21]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Gata6, Nanog and Erk signaling control cell fate in the inner cell mass through a tristable regulatory network , 2014, Development.

[22]  Xinghua Lou,et al.  Quantitative analyses for elucidating mechanisms of cell fate commitment in the mouse blastocyst , 2015, Biomedical optics.

[23]  A. Puliafito,et al.  Heterogeneities in Nanog Expression Drive Stable Commitment to Pluripotency in the Mouse Blastocyst. , 2015, Cell reports.

[24]  A. Hadjantonakis,et al.  Single cells get together: High-resolution approaches to study the dynamics of early mouse development. , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.