The combined evidential value of autosomal and Y-chromosomal DNA profiles obtained from the same sample

When a Y-chromosomal and a (partial) autosomal DNA profile are obtained from one crime sample, and both profiles match the suspect’s profiles, we would like to know the combined evidential value. To calculate the likelihood ratio of observing the autosomal and Y-chromosomal DNA profiles combined, we need to know the conditional random match probability of the observed autosomal DNA profile, given the Y-chromosomal match. We examine this conditional probability in two ways: (1) with a database containing data of 2,085 men and (2) using a simulation model. We conclude that if the Y-chromosomal DNA profiles match, we can still regard the autosomal DNA profile as independent from the Y-chromosomal DNA profile if the matching person is not a descendant of the father of the donor of the (crime) sample. The evidential value can, in that case, be computed by multiplying the random match probabilities of the individual profiles.

[1]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[2]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Twelve short tandem repeat loci Y chromosome haplotypes: genetic analysis on populations residing in North America. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[3]  T. Egeland,et al.  Estimating Haplotype Frequency and Coverage of Databases , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[5]  J S Buckleton,et al.  The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  Charles H Brenner,et al.  Fundamental problem of forensic mathematics--the evidential value of a rare haplotype. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  Amy D. Anderson,et al.  It was one of my brothers , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  V. Pascali,et al.  A new method for the evaluation of matches in non-recombining genomes: application to Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) haplotypes in European males. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[9]  Leon Hirsch.  Weight Of Evidence For Forensic Dna Profiles , 2016 .

[10]  J. Curran,et al.  Relatedness calculations for linked loci incorporating subpopulation effects. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Texas Population Substructure and Its Impact on Estimating the Rarity of Y STR Haplotypes from DNA Evidence * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  D. Kaye.  The Double Helix and the Law of Evidence , 2010 .

[13]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[14]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[15]  Bruce Walsh,et al.  Joint match probabilities for Y chromosomal and autosomal markers. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[16]  A. Amorim.  A cautionary note on the evaluation of genetic evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  S. Palenik.  Review of: Color Atlas and Manual of Microscopy for Criminalists, Chemists and Conservators , 2004 .

[18]  M. Krawczak,et al.  Estimating trace-suspect match probabilities for singleton Y-STR haplotypes using coalescent theory. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.