Performance Measurement System Design and Functional Strategic Decision Influence: The Role of Performance Measure Properties

Although conceptual research in the accounting literature suggests that the use of performance-measurement systems affects the influence of organizational actors, empirical evidence for this suggestion is largely limited to anecdotal evidence and a few qualitative case studies. Drawing on institutional theory, we develop predictions that link the use of performance measures to the influence of functional subunits in strategic decision making. Our research model tests the effects of two types of performance-measure use on functional strategic decision influence: (1) decision-facilitating use and (2) use for accountability. Moreover, we propose that the effects of using performance measures for these two purposes depend on the reliability and functional specificity of the measures the functional subunits use. We empirically test our hypotheses and a research question with survey data from 192 marketing directors of German firms. We find that the effect of performance-measure use on functional strategic decision influence depends on the two properties of the performance measures. We find no significant effects when these properties are not considered. However, decision-facilitating use of performance measures has a positive effect on functional strategic decision influence when the measures are specific to the functional subunit. With respect to the use of performance measures for accountability we find countervailing effects, as the effect on functional strategic decision influence is positive when the measures are more reliable but negative when they are more specific to the functional subunit. We discuss these findings in light of existing evidence and theory.

[1]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department , 2008 .

[2]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization , 2002 .

[3]  Michael Jensen,et al.  Corporate Elites and Corporate Strategy: How Demographic Preferences and Structural Position Shape the Scope of the Firm , 2004 .

[4]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[5]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  A Field Study of Control System “Redesign”: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice* , 1996 .

[6]  P. Williams.  THE LEGITIMATE CONCERN WITH FAIRNESS. , 1987 .

[7]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  Leadership and Control System Design , 2010 .

[8]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Management Information Systems, Communications, and Departmental Power: An Integrative Model , 1981 .

[9]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: The Effect of Strategy Information on Performance Evaluation Judgments , 2011 .

[10]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures , 2000 .

[11]  K. Merchant,et al.  Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives , 2003 .

[12]  P. Leeflang,et al.  Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence within the Firm , 2009 .

[13]  A. Richardson,et al.  ACCOUNTING AS A LEGITIMATING INSTITUTION. , 1987 .

[14]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[15]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Balancing Performance Measures , 2001 .

[16]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  A Guide to Modern Econometrics , 2000 .

[17]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[18]  C. Hill.  Differentiation Versus Low Cost or Differentiation and Low Cost: A Contingency Framework , 1988 .

[19]  Harry I. Wolk,et al.  Accounting theory : a conceptual and institutional approach : instructor's manual , 1984 .

[20]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Opening the Black Box: Internal Capital Markets and Managerial Power , 2013 .

[21]  T. J. Brignall,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the 'New Public Sector' , 2000 .

[22]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Accounting Theory: An Information Content Perspective , 2002 .

[23]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[24]  Jacob G. Birnberg,et al.  The Accountability Demand for Information in China and the US - A Research Note , 2008 .

[25]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Reflections on a contingent view of accounting , 1997 .

[26]  Joel S. Demski.  Managerial Uses of Accounting Information , 1997 .

[27]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar? , 2003 .

[28]  Paula M. G. van Veen-Dirks,et al.  Performance Measurement System Design in Joint Strategy Settings , 2008 .

[29]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Handbook of Research on Top Management Teams , 2012 .

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[31]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[32]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[33]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Mapping Management Accounting: Graphics and Guidelines for Theory-Consistent Empirical Research , 2003 .

[34]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  The Intraorganizational Power Struggle: Rise of Finance Personnel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919-1979 , 1987 .

[36]  Bhagwan S. Khanna.  Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories and Methods , 2008 .

[37]  Y. Ijiri,et al.  Theory Of Accounting Measurement , 1976 .

[38]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[40]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The budgetary process of power and politics , 1986 .

[41]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures , 2007 .

[42]  Gerald A. Feltham,et al.  Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach , 1976 .

[43]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[44]  F. Moers.  Performance Measure Properties and Delegation , 2006 .

[45]  Alex Miller,et al.  ASSESSING PORTER'S (1980) MODEL IN TERMS OF ITS GENERALIZABILITY, ACCURACY AND SIMPLICITY , 1993 .

[46]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .

[47]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  Determinants of Control System Design in Divisionalized Firms , 2004 .

[48]  K. J. Euske,et al.  RATIONAL, RATIONALIZING, AND REIFYING USES OF ACCOUNTING DATA IN ORGANIZATIONS. , 1987 .

[49]  B. Lev.  Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[50]  D. Larcker,et al.  Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective , 2001 .

[51]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[52]  NON-PROFIT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR , 2008 .

[53]  L. Lent,et al.  Endogeneity in Management Accounting Research: A Comment , 2007 .

[54]  Ira Solomon,et al.  Effects of alternative sample space representations on the accuracy of auditors' uncertainty judgments , 1987 .

[55]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[56]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Dysfunctional behavior and management control: An empirical study of marketing managers , 1992 .

[57]  Lixin Ye,et al.  On the Use of Customized versus Standardized Performance Measures , 2005 .

[58]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Marketing's Influence within the Firm , 1999 .

[59]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[61]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[62]  Gerald A. Feltham,et al.  Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations , 2007 .

[63]  Casey M. Rowe,et al.  Hardening Soft Accounting Information: Games for Planning Organizational Change , 2012 .

[64]  Paula van Veen-Dirks,et al.  Financial versus non-financial information: The impact of information organization and presentation in a Balanced Scorecard , 2010 .

[65]  Sally K. Widener,et al.  Associations between strategic resource importance and performance measure use: The impact on firm performance , 2006 .

[66]  Richard T. Mowday,et al.  Leader Characteristics, Self-Confidence, and Methods of Upward Influence in Organizational Decision Situations , 1979 .

[67]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[68]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies , 2005 .

[69]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach , 1998 .

[70]  R. Banker,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy , 2004 .

[71]  David Emsley,et al.  Variance analysis and performance: two empirical studies , 2000 .

[72]  L. Zucker.  Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[73]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[74]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[75]  Paula van Veen-Dirks.  Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers , 2010 .

[76]  Liisa Kurunmäki.  Professional vs financial capital in the field of health care--struggles for the redistribution , 1999 .

[77]  John H. Waterhouse,et al.  A contingency framework for management accounting systems research , 1978 .

[78]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Intraorganizational power considerations for designing information systems , 1978 .

[79]  Frank Moers,et al.  The Issue of Endogeneity within Theory-Based, Quantitative Management Accounting Research , 2007 .

[80]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[81]  Jean-François Henri.  ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[82]  Frøystein Gjesdal,et al.  ACCOUNTING FOR STEWARDSHIP , 1981 .

[83]  Jaime Ortega,et al.  Power in the Firm and Managerial Career Concerns , 2003 .

[84]  R. H. Finn.  A Note on Estimating the Reliability of Categorical Data , 1970 .

[85]  A. Wyatt.  What Financial and Non-Financial Information on Intangibles is Value Relevant? A Review of the Evidence , 2008 .

[86]  Emidia Vagnoni,et al.  Power, organization design and managerial behaviour , 2004 .

[87]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis , 1999 .

[88]  Jonas Gerdin,et al.  Management accounting system design in manufacturing departments: an empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach , 2005 .