The effectiveness of a math game: The impact of integrating conceptual clarification as support

This study investigates the impact of integrating conceptual clarifications as support in an educational math game, and explores the impact of adding this (internal vs. external) support on students game and mathematical performance, intrinsic motivation, and game perception. Three conditions are established: a condition in which internal support is offered, a condition in which (identical) external support is offered, and a control condition in which no support is added to the game. One hundred twenty-two vocational secondary education students participated in this study. The results of this study indicate that students benefit from playing with an educational game in order to enhance their proportional reasoning skills. Adding conceptual clarifications as instructional support in an intrinsically integrated game is not recommended. If the support is given to the students anyhow, it is advised to offer it externally because internally integrating this support leads to a decrease in performance and motivation. Hence, not only support as such, but also the way it is integrated in the game-based learning process, might be decisive for its effectivity. Obviously, further research is warranted in order to replicate these findings also for other types of support, other game-based learning environments and other target groups. Playing with the GBLE stimulated students proportional reasoning ability.Conceptual clarifications in an intrinsically integrated GBLE are not recommended.Support, and the way it is integrated in a GBLE, are decisive for its effectivity.

[1]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Students’ Preferred Characteristics of Learning Environments in Vocational Secondary Education , 2014 .

[2]  Ina Blau,et al.  Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Brian C. Nelson Exploring the Use of Individualized, Reflective Guidance In an Educational Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2007 .

[4]  D. Shaffer Pedagogical Praxis: The Professions as Models for Postindustrial Education , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[5]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools , 2009 .

[6]  Noah S. Podolefsky Learning science through computer games and simulations , 2012 .

[7]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Instructional support in games , 2011, CGAMES 2011.

[8]  Paul Maharg,et al.  Series editors' introduction [Digital games and learning: research and theory] , 2014 .

[9]  Nicola Whitton Digital Games and Learning: Research and Theory , 2014 .

[10]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[11]  R. Lesh,et al.  Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes , 1983 .

[12]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Why process-product research cannot explain process-product findings and a proposed remedy: The cognitive mediational paradigm , 1987 .

[13]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Development and Validation of the Game Perceptions Scale (GPS) , 2015 .

[14]  Wayne Lee EXperimental design and analysis , 1975 .

[15]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[16]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Adding Instructional Features That Promote Learning in a Game-Like Environment , 2010 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[18]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design , 2007 .

[19]  Jan Elen,et al.  Competitie als game-element integreren in de BSO-klaspraktijk , 2015 .

[20]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  Review of research on computer games. , 2011 .

[21]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. , 2002 .

[22]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[23]  G. Salomon Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .

[24]  June Lee,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instructional Simulation: A Meta Analysis. , 1999 .

[25]  Sylke Vandercruysse,et al.  Game-Based Learning: A Review on the Effectiveness of Educational Games , 2012 .

[26]  Jean Écalle,et al.  Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  Dennis Charsky,et al.  Making a Connection : Game Genres, Game Characteristics, and Teaching Structures , 2011 .

[28]  Yeo Gee Kin,et al.  Teacher Perceptions of Games in Singapore Schools , 2012 .

[29]  Ton de Jong,et al.  How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[30]  R. Mayer,et al.  Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game , 2005 .

[31]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[32]  R. Armstrong Review of Research. , 1990 .

[33]  Ton de Jong,et al.  When a game supports prevocational math education but integrated reflection does not , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[34]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Gerry P. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists: Split-plot and repeated measures designs: partly nested analyses of variance , 2002 .

[36]  Jay W. Rojewski,et al.  Effects of Instructional Support in Game-based Learning: An Analysis of Educational Games from Design and Application Perspectives , 2013 .

[37]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Content integration as a factor in math-game effectiveness , 2014 .

[38]  Carlo Perrotta,et al.  Game-Based Learning: Latest Evidence and Future Directions , 2013 .

[39]  Sigmund Tobias,et al.  Learning from Computer Games: A Research Review , 2011 .

[40]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[41]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Zeldenrust: a mathematical game-based learning environment for prevocational students , 2014 .

[43]  Aubteen Darabi,et al.  Progression of mental models throughout the phases of a computer-based instructional simulation: Supportive information, practice, and performance , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  James M. Boyle,et al.  A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Dennis Charsky,et al.  "Games are made for fun": Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[46]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective , 2004 .

[47]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[48]  Richard Van Eck,et al.  A Guide to Integrating COTS Games into Your Classroom , 2009 .