Realising the promises of agricultural big data through a Māori Data Sovereignty approach

ABSTRACT This perspective piece considers how principles of Māori Data Sovereignty can bring us closer to realising some of the social and environmental promises of new AgTech and the agricultural big data they produce. Our analysis is situated within the settler colonial context of Aotearoa New Zealand. We consider how obligations detailed within treaties guaranteeing equal partnership and Māori self-determination provide the foundation for: (1) acknowledging how the promises of agricultural big data depend on the people, priorities, practices and power relations that guide and enact them; and (2) creating the space to question and challenge current trajectories to ensure agricultural big data are collected and used in ways that promote data sovereignty and an equitable distribution of benefits. We argue that, due to their treaty obligations, publicly-funded projects developing AgTech and agricultural big data analytics in and for Aotearoa must begin developing equity- and sovereignty-promoting data management and governance practices.

[1]  Summer Sullivan The immaculate conception of data: Agribusiness, activists, and their shared politics of the future. By KellyBronson, Québec: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2022. pp. 224. C$ 37.95 (pbk)/C$ 130 (hbk). ISBN: 9780228011224 (pbk)/ISBN: 9780228011217 (hbk) , 2023, Journal of Agrarian Change.

[2]  L. Klerkx,et al.  Can a robot be an expert? The social meaning of skill and its expression through the prospect of autonomous AgTech , 2022, Agriculture and Human Values.

[3]  D. Nafus,et al.  Intellectual property meets transdisciplinary co-design: prioritizing responsiveness in the production of new AgTech through located response-ability , 2022, Agriculture and Human Values.

[4]  Kellly Bronson The Immaculate Conception of Data , 2022 .

[5]  C. Driessen,et al.  Automating Agroecology: How to Design a Farming Robot Without a Monocultural Mindset? , 2022, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

[6]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Big Tech Meets Big Ag: Diversifying Epistemologies of Data and Power , 2022, Science as Culture.

[7]  Katharine Legun,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Including Agricultural Workers in the Co‐Design of New AgTech: Lessons from a COVID‐19‐Present World , 2021, Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment.

[8]  S. Sippel,et al.  Imprecision farming? Examining the (in)accuracy and risks of digital agriculture , 2021, Journal of Rural Studies.

[9]  E. Duncan,et al.  New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture , 2021, Agriculture and Human Values.

[10]  Louisa Prause Digital Agriculture and Labor: A Few Challenges for Social Sustainability , 2021, Sustainability.

[11]  J. Guthman Farming Inside Invisible Worlds: Modernist Agriculture and its Consequences , 2021, The AAG Review of Books.

[12]  M. Liboiron Pollution Is Colonialism , 2021 .

[13]  M. Hudson,et al.  The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[14]  M. Carolan Digitization as politics: Smart farming through the lens of weak and strong data , 2020 .

[15]  N. Couldry,et al.  The Costs of Connection , 2020 .

[16]  Ben T. Pettis The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism , 2020, Critical Studies in Media Communication.

[17]  A. Fraser Land grab/data grab: precision agriculture and its new horizons , 2019 .

[18]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[19]  Evan D. G. Fraser,et al.  The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review , 2019, Sociologia Ruralis.

[20]  Christopher Miles,et al.  The combine will tell the truth: On precision agriculture and algorithmic rationality , 2019, Big Data Soc..

[21]  D. Rose,et al.  Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming , 2018, Front. Sustain. Food Syst..

[22]  M. Carolan ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not‐So‐Neoliberal Worlds , 2018 .

[23]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Smart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation , 2018 .

[24]  S. Wolfert,et al.  Big Data in Smart Farming – A review , 2017 .

[25]  Hugh Campbell Farming Inside Invisible Worlds , 2020 .