Despite (or perhaps because of) the lack of central planning, Wi-Fi is fast reaching ‘infrastructure’ scale: Almost unknown three years ago, about 26.5 million WiFi capable devices were sold in 2002 alone, and have been deployed by a multitude of individuals and organizations. Historically, decentralized network segments based on new technologies often served initially to extend previous generation infrastructure, and then eventually expanded to become the dominant infrastructure. Will this be true of WiFi as well? To be sure, not all Wi-Fi deployment is decentralized. Several industrial actors, among them the incumbent telephone companies, are proceeding in a centralized and systematic fashion. Next to them however, a growing number of grass-roots organizations, non-profits, and local governments are deploying local extensions to the existing Internet infrastructure. And an emerging category of consolidators attempt to offer users unified access to these disparate infrastructures. To date however, most Wi-Fi deployment has simply amounted to the addition of “wireless tails”, last-mile extensions to the existing Internet infrastructure. In the future however, one can imagine scenarios under which these uncoordinated initiatives coalesce into a new infrastructure, perhaps one based on mesh networking. This paper reviews current efforts to deploy Wi-Fi infrastructure, along three key dimensions: architecture, coordination, and control. It situates them within a broad theoretical framework describing the evolution of information infrastructures. The framework builds on several core concepts, including the tension between centralized and decentralized deployment efforts, the historical patterns of infrastructure deployment and substitution, the role of users in shaping the evolution of technology, and the co-evolution of usage and technical systems.
[1]
G. Hardin,et al.
The Tragedy of the Commons
,
1968,
Green Planet Blues.
[2]
Gerald W. Brock.
The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure
,
1981
.
[3]
T. P. Hughes,et al.
Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930
,
1984
.
[4]
Nathan Rosenberg,et al.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics
,
1984
.
[5]
Paul J. Quirk,et al.
The Politics Of Deregulation
,
1985
.
[6]
P. David.
Clio and the Economics of QWERTY
,
1985
.
[7]
T. L. Schwartz.
The Logic of Collective Action
,
1986
.
[8]
Robert Friedel,et al.
Inventing American Broadcasting 1899-1922
,
1989
.
[9]
Robert B. Horwitz,et al.
The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications
,
1988
.
[10]
Kenneth Lipartito,et al.
The Bell System and Regional Business: The Telephone in the South, 1877-1920
,
1989
.
[11]
The Bell System and Regional Business: The Telephone in the South, 1877–1920 . By Kenneth Lipartito. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989. Pp. xvi, 283. $29.50.
,
1991
.
[12]
David E. Nye,et al.
Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology
,
1992
.
[13]
Rudi Volti,et al.
America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940
,
1992
.
[14]
R. McChesney,et al.
Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of U.S. Broadcasting, 1928-1935
,
1994,
History of Education Quarterly.
[15]
G. Brady.
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
,
1993
.
[16]
D. North.
Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events
,
1994
.
[17]
D. P. Satapathy,et al.
Spectrum Sharing Without Licenses: Opportunities and Dangers
,
1996
.
[18]
P. David.
The Evolving Accidental Information Super‐Highway
,
2001
.
[19]
Stuart Minor Benjamin.
Spectrum Abundance and the Choice Between Private and Public Control
,
2003
.
[20]
Harmeet Sawhney,et al.
Wi-Fi networks and the rerun of the cycle
,
2003
.
[21]
Ashish Agarwal,et al.
WIRELESS GRIDS: APPROACHES, ARCHITECTURES, AND TECHNICAL CHALLENGES
,
2004
.