The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception

In the research reported here, we investigated the influence of phonological neighborhood density on the processing of words in the visual lexical decision task. The results of the first experiment revealed that words with large phonological neighborhoods were verified more rapidly than words with small phonological neighborhoods. In the second experiment, we replicated this effect with a more tightly controlled set of stimuli. These results demonstrate the importance of phonological codes when processing visually presented letter strings. We relate this research to previous results on semantic and orthographic neighborhoods and discuss the results within the context of a model in which lexical decisions are based on stimulus familiarity.

[1]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .

[2]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[3]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[4]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[5]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[6]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[7]  H. Nusbaum.  Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[8]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Processing implicit and explicit representations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. , 2003 .

[10]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[11]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[13]  Usha Goswami,et al.  Similarity relations among spoken words: The special status of rimes in English , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The basis of consistency effects in word naming , 1990 .

[16]  Lawrence Locker,et al.  Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001 .

[18]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Ziegler,et al.  The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .

[20]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[22]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[23]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[24]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .