Based on flux-difference splitting, implicit high-resolution schemes are constructed for efficient computations of steady-state solution to the three-dimensional, incompressibl e Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. These schemes use first-order-accurate Euler backward-time differencing and second-order central differencing for the viscous shear fluxes. Up to third-order-accurate upwind differencing is achieved through a reconstruction of the solution from its cell averages. The reconstruction is accomplished by linear interpolation, where the node stencils are selected such that in regions of smooth solution the flow is highly resolved while spurious oscillations in regions of rapid changes in gradient are still suppressed. Fairly rapid convergence to steady-state solutions is attained with a vectorizable hybrid time-marching method. Flows around a sharp-edged delta wing are computed with the maximum accuracy of the upwind differencing restricted to first, second, and third order, to illustrate the effect of accuracy oh the global and on the local vortical flowfields. The results are validated with experimental data. I. Introduction T HERE are basically two options to compute threedimensional low-speed flows as steady-state solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations: numerical approximations 1) to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations for low Mach numbers (M), or 2) to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In view of the numerous time-dependent methods, both explicit1 and implicit,2'4 for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, the first option appears to be a viable choice. However, the efficiency of these schemes deteriorates considerably with decreasing subsonic Mach number due to the "stiffness" of the physical problems associated with lowspeed, viscous flow. The stiffness arises from both disparate characteristic speeds and length scales. Furthermore, the accuracy of low-speed flowfield computations with implicit approximate factorization (AF) schemes (e.g., those in Refs. 2-4) becomes questionable for low Mach numbers, since the factorization errors increase in an unbounded fashion for a decreasing Mach number.5 That suggests to remove the sound speed time scale and to assume the flow to be truly incompressible. Aziz and Heliums6 proposed to solve the Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible, fully three-dimensional flow in a vector potential-vorticity formulation. Because of its storage requirements and the necessity to solve three Poisson equations at each time level, that method failed to become popular. That leaves solving the Navier-Stokes equations for threedimensional, incompressible flow in their primitive variable formulation. Common methods for this formulation advance the solution for the velocity field by explicitly or implicitly solving the equations of motion. The updated velocity field is used to compute the corresponding pressure field by solving a Poisson equation7 or by an iterative procedure with the equation of continuity as a compatibility condition.8 Such schemes
[1]
Paul Kutler,et al.
Implicit Finite-Difference Procedures for the Computation of Vortex Wakes
,
1976
.
[2]
B. V. Leer,et al.
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme
,
1974
.
[3]
S. Richardson,et al.
A model for the boundary condition of a porous material. Part 2
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[4]
Shigeru Obayashi,et al.
Computation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Transonic Flows Using the LU-ADI Factored Scheme
,
1985
.
[5]
H. C. Yee,et al.
Implicit Total Variation Diminishing (TVD) schemes for steady-state calculations. [in gas dynamics
,
1985
.
[6]
Lewis B. Schiff,et al.
Computation of turbulent supersonic flows around pointed bodies having crossflow separation
,
1986
.
[7]
J. Steger,et al.
Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods
,
1981
.
[8]
Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.
On implicit finite-difference simulations of three-dimensional flow
,
1978
.
[9]
F. Harlow,et al.
Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface
,
1965
.
[10]
B. V. Leer,et al.
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection
,
1977
.
[11]
P. Sweby.
High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
,
1984
.
[12]
W. K. Anderson,et al.
Navier-Stokes Computations of Vortical Flows Over Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings
,
1987
.
[13]
S. Chakravarthy,et al.
The Split Coefficient Matrix method for hyperbolic systems of gasdynamic equations
,
1980
.
[14]
P. Roe.
CHARACTERISTIC-BASED SCHEMES FOR THE EULER EQUATIONS
,
1986
.
[15]
P. Hartwich,et al.
Implicit hybrid schemes for the flux-difference split, three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations
,
1986
.
[16]
Khalid Aziz,et al.
Numerical Solution of the Three-Dimensional Equations of Motion for Laminar Natural Convection
,
1967
.
[17]
S. Osher,et al.
Very High Order Accurate TVD Schemes
,
1986
.
[18]
Arthur Rizzi,et al.
Computation of inviscid incompressible flow with rotation
,
1985,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[19]
H. Lomax,et al.
Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows
,
1978
.
[20]
P. Lax.
Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves
,
1987
.
[21]
V. N. Vatsa,et al.
Accurate numerical solutions for transonic viscous flow over finite wings
,
1987
.
[22]
P. Hartwich.
Finite difference solutions of the Euler equations in the vicinity of sharp edges
,
1985
.
[23]
V. N. Vatsa.
Accurate solutions for transonic viscous flow over finite wings
,
1986
.