Quantitative Bayesian model‐based analysis of amide proton transfer MRI

Amide Proton Transfer (APT) reports on contrast derived from the exchange of protons between amide groups and water. Commonly, APT contrast is quantified by asymmetry analysis, providing an ensemble contrast of both amide proton concentration and exchange rate. An alternative is to sample the off‐resonant spectrum and fit an exchange model, permitting the APT effect to be quantified, correcting automatically for confounding effects of spillover, field inhomogeneity, and magnetization transfer. Additionally, it should permit amide concentration and exchange rate to be independently quantified. Here, a Bayesian method is applied to this problem allowing pertinent prior information to be specified. A three‐pool model was used incorporating water protons, amide protons, and magnetization transfer effect. The method is demonstrated in simulations, creatine phantoms with varying pH and in vivo (n = 7). The Bayesian model‐based approach was able to quantify the APT effect accurately (root‐mean‐square error < 2%) even when subject to confounding field variation and magnetization transfer effect, unlike traditional asymmetry analysis. The in vivo results gave approximate APT concentration (relative to water) and exchange rate values of 3 × 10−3 and 15 s−1. A degree of correlation was observed between these parameter making the latter difficult to quantify with absolute accuracy, suggesting that more optimal sampling strategies might be required. Magn Reson Med 70:556–567, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Relaxation‐compensated fast multislice amide proton transfer (APT) imaging of acute ischemic stroke , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Variational Bayesian Inference for a Nonlinear Forward Model , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Imaging pH using the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: Correction of concomitant RF irradiation effects to quantify CEST MRI for chemical exchange rate and pH , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Peter Bachert,et al.  Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[5]  M. Chappell,et al.  Evaluating the use of a continuous approximation for model-based quantification of pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[6]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and spectroscopy , 2006 .

[7]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Correction for artifacts induced by B0 and B1 field inhomogeneities in pH‐sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  Four‐pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI–paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  C. Morrison,et al.  A Model for Magnetization Transfer in Tissues , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Optimization of the irradiation power in chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer experiments. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Nirbhay N. Yadav,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): What is in a name and what isn't? , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Matthew E Merritt,et al.  Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  S. Deoni,et al.  High‐resolution T1 mapping of the brain at 3T with driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 with high‐speed incorporation of RF field inhomogeneities (DESPOT1‐HIFI) , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Quantitative description of the asymmetry in magnetization transfer effects around the water resonance in the human brain , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Vaibhav A. Janve,et al.  Optimizing pulsed‐chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging sequences , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J Stancanello,et al.  Development and validation of a smoothing-splines-based correction method for improving the analysis of CEST-MR images. , 2008, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[18]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[20]  Peter C M van Zijl,et al.  MRI detection of glycogen in vivo by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST) , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  H. Mcconnell Reaction Rates by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1958 .

[22]  Vaibhav A. Janve,et al.  Multi‐angle ratiometric approach to measure chemical exchange in amide proton transfer imaging , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Quantitative description of proton exchange processes between water and endogenous and exogenous agents for WEX, CEST, and APT experiments , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Ravinder Reddy,et al.  In vivo mapping of brain myo-inositol , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Detection of the Ischemic Penumbra Using pH-Weighted MRI , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[26]  A Dean Sherry,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[27]  Daniel C Alexander,et al.  Optimal acquisition schemes for in vivo quantitative magnetization transfer MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  S. Deoni,et al.  Transverse relaxation time (T2) mapping in the brain with off‐resonance correction using phase‐cycled steady‐state free precession imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  J. Chai,et al.  Estimation of in vivo proton intrinsic and cross‐relaxation rates in human brain , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Simulation and optimization of pulsed radio frequency irradiation scheme for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI—demonstration of pH‐weighted pulsed‐amide proton CEST MRI in an animal model of acute cerebral ischemia , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  In vivo three‐dimensional whole‐brain pulsed steady‐state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[35]  Thomas Benner,et al.  Investigation of optimizing and translating pH‐sensitive pulsed‐chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging to a 3T clinical scanner , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation time and saturation power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): Ph calibration for poly‐L‐lysine and a starburst dendrimer , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Phillip Zhe Sun,et al.  Simultaneous determination of labile proton concentration and exchange rate utilizing optimal RF power: Radio frequency power (RFP) dependence of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[38]  D. Woessner,et al.  Nuclear Transfer Effects in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Pulse Experiments , 1961 .