A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain.

Brain is a morphologically and mechanically heterogeneous organ. Although rat brain is commonly used as an experimental neurophysiological model for various in vivo biomechanical studies, little is known about its regional viscoelastic properties. To address this issue, we have generated viscoelastic mechanical property data for specific anatomical regions of the P17 and adult rat brain. These ages are commonly used in rat experimental models. We measured mechanical properties of both white and gray matter regions in coronal slices with a custom-designed microindentation device performing stress-relaxation indentations to 10% effective strain. Shear moduli calculated for short (100?ms), intermediate (1?sec), and long (20?sec) time points, ranged from ?1?kPa for short term moduli to ?0.4?kPa for long term moduli. Both age and anatomic region were significant factors affecting the time-dependent shear modulus. White matter regions and regions of the cerebellum were much more compliant than those of the hippocampus, cortex, and thalamus. Linear viscoelastic models (Prony series, continuous phase lag, and a power law model) were fit to the time-dependent shear modulus data. All models fit the data equally with no significant differences between them (F-test; p>0.05). The F-test was also used to statistically determine that a Prony series with three time-dependent parameters accurately fit the data with no added benefit from additional terms. The age- and region-dependent rat brain viscoelastic properties presented here will help inform future biomechanical models of the rat brain with specific and accurate regional mechanical property data.

[1]  G W M Peters,et al.  Towards a reliable characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: The effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. , 2007, Biorheology.

[2]  L. E. Scriven,et al.  Flat‐punch indentation of viscoelastic material , 2000 .

[3]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  H. K. P. Neubert,et al.  A Simple Model Representing Internal Damping in Solid Materials , 1963 .

[5]  X. Guo,et al.  Interfacial strength of cement lines in human cortical bone. , 2005, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[6]  S. Kleiven Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  B. Ang,et al.  Biomechanical modeling of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[8]  J. Crandall,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  C. Bonferroni Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste , 1935 .

[11]  I. N. Sneddon,et al.  The elastic stresses produced by the indentation of the plane surface of a semi-infinite elastic solid by a rigid punch , 1945, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: a review. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Brittany Coats,et al.  Material properties of porcine parietal cortex. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. Hildebrandt Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by Laplace transform methods from pressure-volume data. , 1969, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[15]  Karol Miller,et al.  Biomechanical modelling of normal pressure hydrocephalus. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[17]  M. Potts,et al.  Injury severity determines Purkinje cell loss and microglial activation in the cerebellum after cortical contusion injury , 2007, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Determination of the effective zero-point and the extraction of spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves , 2008 .

[20]  B. Morrison,et al.  Age-dependent regional mechanical properties of the rat hippocampus and cortex. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Amit Gefen,et al.  Computational studies of strain exposures in neonate and mature rat brains during closed head impact. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[22]  A. Gefen,et al.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[23]  K B Arbogast,et al.  Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  King H. Yang,et al.  Application of a finite element model of the brain to study traumatic brain injury mechanisms in the rat. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[25]  R. Metzler,et al.  Generalized viscoelastic models: their fractional equations with solutions , 1995 .

[26]  E. Berger,et al.  Measuring viscoelasticity of soft samples using atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Michele J Grimm,et al.  The high frequency properties of brain tissue. , 2004, Biorheology.

[28]  Jürgen Braun,et al.  Scatter-based magnetic resonance elastography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  S. Duma,et al.  Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model. , 2008, Stapp car crash journal.

[30]  Larry A Taber,et al.  On the effects of residual stress in microindentation tests of soft tissue structures. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.