Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model

The time to name a nonword increases monotonically as letter length increases. The leading computational model of basic processes in reading (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon & Ziegler’sdual route cascaded model) simulates this, because its nonlexical route assigns phonemes to letters serially, left to right, and arguably, this corresponds to what humans do. New simulation work shows that (1) this letter length effect interacts with the effect of slowing the rate of early processing, and (2) the model produces a qualitatively different pattern from that observed with university-level readers. The contrast between simulation and human performance thus illuminates a problem with how the nonlexical route operates in the model, and constrains accounts that can be provided for the human data. Consideration is given to thresholding the output of the letter-level module as a way to modify the model so as to make it possible to simulate the human data.

[1]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[3]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud , 1999 .

[4]  Derek Besner,et al.  Models of Lexical Access in Visual Word Recognition , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[6]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Identical Words are Read Differently in Different Languages , 2001, Psychological science.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[8]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition , 1997 .

[9]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .

[10]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[11]  Derek Besner,et al.  When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[13]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[14]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[15]  B. Weekes.  Differential Effects of Number of Letters on Word and Nonword Naming Latency , 1997 .

[16]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[18]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. , 1992 .

[19]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[20]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[21]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading , 1998 .

[22]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  M Coltheart,et al.  Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology is complete. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  S. Sternberg.  Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. , 1998 .

[25]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .