Promoting Constructive Activities that Support Vicarious Learning During Computer-Based Instruction

This article explores several ways computer-based instruction can be designed to support constructive activities and promote deep-level comprehension during vicarious learning. Vicarious learning, discussed in the first section, refers to knowledge acquisition under conditions in which the learner is not the addressee and does not physically interact in any way with the source of the content to be mastered. The second section describes cognitive constructivism from the standpoint of schema theory and the work of Bartlett (1932). The next section describes four principles of curriculum design that support constructive processes during vicarious learning and reviews the process of self-explanation and how computer prompted self-explanation supports constructive activities. Research showing the important role that overhearing deep-level reasoning questions plays in supporting constructive activities and deep-level learning is also described. In the next section, vicarious learning supported by deep-level reasoning questions is contrasted with tutoring as one kind of interactive learning. In the final section, some conclusions are drawn, a few empirical issues are discussed, and two caveats are noted.

[1]  C. L. M.,et al.  Outlines of Psychology , 1891, Nature.

[2]  James Rowland Angell,et al.  Studies from the psychological laboratory of the University of Chicago: III. The organic effects of agreeable and disagreeable stimuli; IV. Simultaneous sense stimulations: Practice study , 1896 .

[3]  W. Wundt,et al.  Outline of psychology. , 1897 .

[4]  E. Thorndike “Animal Intelligence” , 1898, Nature.

[5]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[6]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[7]  L. Rue,et al.  Psychology for Teachers , 1921, The School Review.

[8]  W. Köhler The Mentality of Apes. , 2018, Nature.

[9]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[10]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[11]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[12]  D. H. Wheeler,et al.  The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .

[13]  P. Mussen,et al.  Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology , 1972 .

[14]  J. Edwards Genetic Epistemology , 1971 .

[15]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[16]  Jean Piaget,et al.  To Understand Is to Invent , 1973 .

[17]  Jean Piaget Piaget’s Theory , 1976 .

[18]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[19]  T. Rosenthal,et al.  Social Learning and Cognition , 1978 .

[20]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[21]  David Fontana Psychology for Teachers , 1981 .

[22]  E. Glasersfeld An Introduction to Radical Constructivism , 1981 .

[23]  I. Kant,et al.  Grounding for the metaphysics of morals , 1981 .

[24]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[25]  S. Parker,et al.  Origins of Intelligence , 1983, Springer US.

[26]  Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al.  SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .

[27]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[29]  A. Graesser,et al.  The Psychology of Questions , 1985 .

[30]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[31]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[32]  M. Ash 11 – Gestalt Psychology: Origins in Germany and Reception in the United States* , 1985 .

[33]  T. E. Raphael,et al.  Metacognition, Instruction, and the Role of Questioning Activities , 1985 .

[34]  James Hartley,et al.  A research strategy for text desigbers: The role of headings , 1985 .

[35]  B. Davey,et al.  Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension , 1986 .

[36]  C. Buxton Influences in Psychology. (Book Reviews: Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology) , 1986 .

[37]  J. Sweller,et al.  Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. , 1987 .

[38]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Inference in Text Understanding , 1987, AAAI.

[39]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Sherlock: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job. , 1988 .

[41]  Are Questions Just Function Calls , 1988 .

[42]  J. T. Dillon Questioning and Teaching: A Manual of Practice , 1988 .

[43]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .

[44]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Constraints on Question Asking in Classrooms. , 1988 .

[45]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  M. Wittrock Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[47]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[48]  N. Webb Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[49]  C. Penney Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  A. King Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures , 1989 .

[52]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Robert B. Davis,et al.  Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics , 1990 .

[54]  M. Ferguson-Hessler,et al.  Studying Physics Texts: Differences in Study Processes Between Good and Poor Performers , 1990 .

[55]  Drew McDermott,et al.  A critique of pure reason 1 , 1987, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[56]  D. Hilton Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[57]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[58]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[59]  A. King Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning , 1990 .

[60]  J. Sweller,et al.  Structuring Effective Worked Examples , 1990 .

[61]  S. Duffy,et al.  The effect of encoding task on memory for sentence pairs varying in causal relatedness , 1990 .

[62]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[63]  E. Glasersfeld An Exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like it Radical , 1991 .

[64]  D. Jonassen Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[65]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Educational Applications of a Networked Communal Database , 1992, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[66]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  A model of the self-explanation effect. , 1992 .

[67]  Otto Jelsma,et al.  Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills , 1992 .

[68]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Computer-assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems - shared goals and complementary approaches , 1992, Technology in education series.

[69]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[70]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[71]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[72]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective. , 1993 .

[73]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective , 2008 .

[74]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz , 1993, INTERCHI.

[75]  P. David Pearson Standards for the English Language Arts: A Policy Perspective1 , 1993 .

[76]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[77]  Mitchell J. Nathan Learning through Self-Explanation of Mathematics Examples: Effects of Cognitive Load. , 1994 .

[78]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[79]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[80]  Margaret M. Recker,et al.  Learning Strategies and Transfer in the Domain of Programming , 1994 .

[81]  A. King Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain , 1994 .

[82]  A. King Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain , 1994 .

[83]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[84]  E. Glasersfeld Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. , 1995 .

[85]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. , 1995 .

[86]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[87]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[88]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[89]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[90]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate , 1996 .

[91]  L. Steels,et al.  Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents , 2006, AAAI 2012.

[92]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[93]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[94]  R. Prawat Constructivisms, modern and postmodern , 1996 .

[95]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second.. , 1996 .

[96]  W. Baggett,et al.  Question-driven Explanatory Reasoning , 1996 .

[97]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[98]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Learning from Worked-Out-Examples: A Study on Individual Differences , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[99]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[100]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[101]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Two Decades of Structure Building. , 1997, Discourse processes.

[102]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[103]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[104]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[105]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[106]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[107]  Richard Cox,et al.  Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[108]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Observation versus Hands-on Practice of Complex Skills in Dyadic, Triadic, and Tetradic Training-Teams , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[109]  A. King,et al.  Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. , 1998 .

[110]  Sharon J. Deny,et al.  How Tutors Model Students: A Study of Personal Constructs in Adaptive Tutoring , 1998 .

[111]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment , 2000 .

[112]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer , 1999 .

[113]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Tutoring Answer Explanation Fosters Learning with Understanding , 1999 .

[114]  C. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models , 1999 .

[115]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[116]  Jean E. Fox Tree,et al.  Listening in on monologues and dialogues , 1999 .

[117]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[118]  Richard Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse -- A controlled comparison , 1999 .

[119]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Australian Education Review, No. 43. , 1999 .

[120]  R. Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse , 1999 .

[121]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  The Need for Tutorial Dialog to Support Self-Explanation , 2000 .

[122]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Evaluate the Contributions of Students in AutoTutor , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[123]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Overhearing Dialogues and Monologues in Virtual Tutoring Sessions: Effects on Questioning and Vicarious Learning , 2000 .

[124]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[125]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[126]  A. Graesser,et al.  PREG: Elements of a Model of Question Asking , 2001 .

[127]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[128]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Computer Tutors: Solving the Two-Sigma Problem , 2001, User Modeling.

[129]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[130]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Teaching Tactics and Dialog in AutoTutor , 2001 .

[131]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[132]  Richard E. Mayer 14. Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text , 2002 .

[133]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[134]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. , 2002 .

[135]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[136]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. , 2003 .

[137]  Kathy L. Schuh Knowledge construction in the learner-centered classroom. , 2003 .

[138]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Vicarious Learning: Effects of Overhearing Dialog and Monologue-like Discourse in a Virtual Tutoring Session , 2003 .

[139]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[140]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Constructing Knowledge from Dialog in an Intelligent Tutoring System: Interactive Learning, Vicarious Learning, and Pedagogical Agents , 2004 .

[141]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  Suppressing Irrelevant Information: Knowledge Activation or Inhibition? , 2004 .

[142]  John Lee,et al.  Supporting Student Discussions: it isn't Just Talk , 1998, Education and Information Technologies.

[143]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[144]  Should we question them?: An investigation into the role of deep questions in Vicarious Learning Environments , 2004 .

[145]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[146]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[147]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning , 2006 .

[148]  Learning physics vicariously: A test of the deep-level reasoning questions effect in a vicarious learning environment on physics , 2006 .

[149]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Natural Language Tutoring: A comparison of human tutors, computer tutors, and text , 2007 .

[150]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[151]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .