Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet

A brave new world with a wider view Researchers have long attempted to follow animals as they move through their environment. Until relatively recently, however, such efforts were limited to short distances and times in species large enough to carry large batteries and transmitters. New technologies have opened up new frontiers in animal tracking remote data collection. Hussey et al. review the unique directions such efforts have taken for marine systems, while Kays et al. review recent advances for terrestrial species. We have entered a new era of animal ecology, where animals act as both subjects and samplers of their environments. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1255642, 10.1126/science.aaa2478 BACKGROUND The movement of animals makes them fascinating but difficult study subjects. Animal movements underpin many biological phenomena, and understanding them is critical for applications in conservation, health, and food. Traditional approaches to animal tracking used field biologists wielding antennas to record a few dozen locations per animal, revealing only the most general patterns of animal space use. The advent of satellite tracking automated this process, but initially was limited to larger animals and increased the resolution of trajectories to only a few hundred locations per animal. The last few years have shown exponential improvement in tracking technology, leading to smaller tracking devices that can return millions of movement steps for ever-smaller animals. Finally, we have a tool that returns high-resolution data that reveal the detailed facets of animal movement and its many implications for biodiversity, animal ecology, behavior, and ecosystem function. ADVANCES Improved technology has brought animal tracking into the realm of big data, not only through high-resolution movement trajectories, but also through the addition of other on-animal sensors and the integration of remote sensing data about the environment through which these animals are moving. These new data are opening up a breadth of new scientific questions about ecology, evolution, and physiology and enable the use of animals as sensors of the environment. High–temporal resolution movement data also can document brief but important contacts between animals, creating new opportunities to study social networks, as well as interspecific interactions such as competition and predation. With solar panels keeping batteries charged, “lifetime” tracks can now be collected for some species, while broader approaches are aiming for species-wide sampling across multiple populations. Miniaturized tags also help reduce the impact of the devices on the study subjects, improving animal welfare and scientific results. As in other disciplines, the explosion of data volume and variety has created new challenges and opportunities for information management, integration, and analysis. In an exciting interdisciplinary push, biologists, statisticians, and computer scientists have begun to develop new tools that are already leading to new insights and scientific breakthroughs. OUTLOOK We suggest that a golden age of animal tracking science has begun and that the upcoming years will be a time of unprecedented exciting discoveries. Technology continues to improve our ability to track animals, with the promise of smaller tags collecting more data, less invasively, on a greater variety of animals. The big-data tracking studies that are just now being pioneered will become commonplace. If analytical developments can keep pace, the field will be able to develop real-time predictive models that integrate habitat preferences, movement abilities, sensory capacities, and animal memories into movement forecasts. The unique perspective offered by big-data animal tracking enables a new view of animals as naturally evolved sensors of environment, which we think has the potential to help us monitor the planet in completely new ways. A massive multi-individual monitoring program would allow a quorum sensing of our planet, using a variety of species to tap into the diversity of senses that have evolved across animal groups, providing new insight on our world through the sixth sense of the global animal collective. We expect that the field will soon reach a transformational point where these studies do more than inform us about particular species of animals, but allow the animals to teach us about the world. Big-data animal tracking. The red trajectory shows how studies can now track animals with unprecedented detail, allowing researchers to predict the causes and consequences of movements, and animals to become environmental sensors. Multisensor tracking tags monitor movement, behavior, physiology, and environmental context. Geo- and biosciences merge now using a multitude of remote-sensing data. Understanding how social and interspecific interactions affect movement is the next big frontier. Moving animals connect our world, spreading pollen, seeds, nutrients, and parasites as they go about the their daily lives. Recent integration of high-resolution Global Positioning System and other sensors into miniaturized tracking tags has dramatically improved our ability to describe animal movement. This has created opportunities and challenges that parallel big data transformations in other fields and has rapidly advanced animal ecology and physiology. New analytical approaches, combined with remotely sensed or modeled environmental information, have opened up a host of new questions on the causes of movement and its consequences for individuals, populations, and ecosystems. Simultaneous tracking of multiple animals is leading to new insights on species interactions and, scaled up, may enable distributed monitoring of both animals and our changing environment.

[1]  G. ELLIOT SMITH,et al.  The New Vision , 1928, Nature.

[2]  R. Lord,et al.  Radiotelemetry of the Respiration of a Flying Duck , 1962, Science.

[3]  J. Tait,et al.  Challenges and opportunities. , 1996, Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing.

[4]  C. Kummerow,et al.  The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor Package , 1998 .

[5]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[6]  K. Logan,et al.  Cougar Dispersal Patterns, Metapopulation Dynamics, and Conservation , 2000 .

[7]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[8]  K. Bildstein RAPTOR MIGRATION IN THE NEOTROPICS: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2004 .

[9]  J. Epstein,et al.  The nature of emerging zoonotic diseases: ecology, prediction, and prevention. , 2005, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[10]  David Moskowitz,et al.  Simple rules guide dragonfly migration , 2006, Biology Letters.

[11]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[13]  I. Kojola,et al.  DISPERSAL IN AN EXPANDING WOLF POPULATION IN FINLAND , 2006 .

[14]  J. V. van Gils,et al.  Hampered Foraging and Migratory Performance in Swans Infected with Low-Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Virus , 2007, PloS one.

[15]  Zhihai He,et al.  A new 'view' of ecology and conservation through animal-borne video systems. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  J. Tratalos,et al.  Migration, Patchiness, and Population Processes Illustrated by Two Migrant Pests , 2007 .

[17]  Dean P. Anderson,et al.  State-space models link elk movement patterns to landscape characteristics in Yellowstone National Park , 2007 .

[18]  M. Aizen,et al.  Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[19]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Sleeping outside the box: electroencephalographic measures of sleep in sloths inhabiting a rainforest , 2008, Biology Letters.

[21]  Margaret C Crofoot,et al.  Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Managing wildlife: A spatial information system for GPS collars data , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  David C. Douglas,et al.  Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  W. Jetz,et al.  Phenotypic population divergence in terrestrial vertebrates at macro scales. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[25]  Xiao-jun Yang,et al.  Migration routes and stopover sites of Black‐necked Cranes determined by satellite tracking , 2009 .

[26]  Craig Packer,et al.  Serengeti real estate: density vs. fitness-based indicators of lion habitat quality. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[27]  G. Kerth,et al.  Species-specific barrier effects of a motorway on the habitat use of two threatened forest-living bat species , 2009 .

[28]  Benton H. Calhoun,et al.  Body Area Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities , 2009, Computer.

[29]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Long-Distance Dispersal of a Rescued Wolf From the Northern Apennines to the Western Alps , 2009 .

[30]  Alexei L. Vyssotski,et al.  EEG Responses to Visual Landmarks in Flying Pigeons , 2009, Current Biology.

[31]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  T. Halliday,et al.  Predicting the unpredictable; evidence of pre‐seismic anticipatory behaviour in the common toad , 2010 .

[33]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[34]  Baoping Yan,et al.  Migration of Waterfowl in the East Asian Flyway and Spatial Relationship to HPAI H5N1 Outbreaks , 2010, Avian diseases.

[35]  Daniel J. Thompson,et al.  Dispersal movements of subadult cougars from the Black Hills: the notions of range expansion and recolonization , 2010 .

[36]  Jacqueline L. Frair,et al.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Etienne S Benson,et al.  Wired Wilderness: Technologies of Tracking and the Making of Modern Wildlife , 2010 .

[38]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting the Unpredictable: A New Prediction Model for Operating Room Times Using Individual Characteristics and the Surgeon's Estimate , 2010, Anesthesiology.

[41]  Thomas Ruf,et al.  A versatile telemetry system for continuous measurement of heart rate, body temperature and locomotor activity in free‐ranging ruminants , 2010, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[42]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Wildlife tracking data management: a new vision , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Timing and flight mode of departure in migrating European bee-eaters in relation to multi-scale meteorological processes , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Riding the tide: intriguing observations of gulls resting at sea during breeding , 2011 .

[46]  Tony Fountain,et al.  Tracking Animal Location and Activity with an Automated Radio Telemetry System in a Tropical Rainforest , 2011, Comput. J..

[47]  R. Kays,et al.  Causes of mortality in North American populations of large and medium‐sized mammals , 2011 .

[48]  M. Thaker,et al.  Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates. , 2011, Ecology.

[49]  S. Tilak,et al.  The Movebank data model for animal tracking , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[50]  T. Donovan,et al.  Quantifying home range habitat requirements for bobcats ( Lynx rufus ) in Vermont, USA , 2011 .

[51]  W. Fiedler,et al.  Seed-dispersal distributions by trumpeter hornbills in fragmented landscapes , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  Technology on the Move: Recent and Forthcoming Innovations for Tracking Migratory Birds , 2011 .

[53]  Andrea Kölzsch,et al.  Individually tracked geese follow peaks of temperature acceleration during spring migration , 2012 .

[54]  Gil Bohrer,et al.  Estimating updraft velocity components over large spatial scales: contrasting migration strategies of golden eagles and turkey vultures. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[55]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Beyond the Utilization Distribution: Identifying home range areas that are intensively exploited or repeatedly visited , 2012 .

[56]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[57]  Charles M. Bishop,et al.  Eco-Virological Approach for Assessing the Role of Wild Birds in the Spread of Avian Influenza H5N1 along the Central Asian Flyway , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  Carrie A. Schloss,et al.  Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  Endosymbiosis , 2012, Current Biology.

[60]  J. Altmann,et al.  Intergroup conflict: ecological predictors of winning and consequences of defeat in a wild primate population , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Habitat selection predicts genetic relatedness in an alpine ungulate. , 2012, Ecology.

[63]  Rob Deardon,et al.  An empirically parameterized individual based model of animal movement, perception, and memory , 2013 .

[64]  M. Crofoot The cost of defeat: Capuchin groups travel further, faster and later after losing conflicts with neighbors. , 2013, American journal of physical anthropology.

[65]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and animal movement. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[67]  Jiawei Han,et al.  The environmental-data automated track annotation (Env-DATA) system: linking animal tracks with environmental data , 2013, Movement Ecology.

[68]  R. Kays,et al.  Animal behavior, cost-based corridor models, and real corridors , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[69]  F. Bairlein,et al.  A Palaearctic migratory raptor species tracks shifting prey availability within its wintering range in the Sahel. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[70]  Peter M. Kappeler,et al.  Simultaneous GPS tracking reveals male associations in a solitary carnivore , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  J. Fattebert,et al.  Long-Distance Natal Dispersal in Leopard Reveals Potential for a Three-Country Metapopulation , 2013 .

[72]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs , 2013, Nature.

[73]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  New tracking philosophy for birds , 2013 .

[74]  Bolin Ding,et al.  Attraction and Avoidance Detection from Movements , 2013, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[75]  Clive R. McMahon,et al.  The success of GPS collar deployments on mammals in Australia , 2013 .

[76]  Roland Kays,et al.  Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior , 2013, Animal Biotelemetry.

[77]  Shannon E Albeke,et al.  Linking anti-predator behaviour to prey demography reveals limited risk effects of an actively hunting large carnivore. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[78]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[79]  S. Creel,et al.  Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[80]  G. Sachs,et al.  Experimental verification of dynamic soaring in albatrosses , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[81]  Michael Scantlebury,et al.  Cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus, balance turn capacity with pace when chasing prey , 2013, Biology Letters.

[82]  B. Doligez,et al.  Tracking prospecting movements involved in breeding habitat selection: insights, pitfalls and perspectives , 2013 .

[83]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Integrating frugivory and animal movement: a review of the evidence and implications for scaling seed dispersal , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[84]  Renaud Mathieu,et al.  Quantifying fine-scale resource selection by introduced European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in ecologically sensitive areas , 2013, Biological Invasions.

[85]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Interaction rules underlying group decisions in homing pigeons , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[86]  M. Crofoot,et al.  Spatiotemporal Interactions Among Three Neighboring Groups of Free-Ranging White-Footed Tamarins (Saguinus leucopus) in Colombia , 2013, International Journal of Primatology.

[87]  S. Goetz,et al.  The relative importance of climate and vegetation properties on patterns of North American breeding bird species richness , 2014 .

[88]  M. Lewis,et al.  A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[89]  J. Blas,et al.  Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance , 2014, Nature.

[90]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[91]  F. Bairlein,et al.  Migratory connectivity and population-specific migration routes in a long-distance migratory bird , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[92]  Holger Dettki,et al.  Wireless Remote Animal Monitoring (WRAM) - A new international database e-infrastructure for management and sharing of telemetry sensor data from fish and wildlife , 2014 .

[93]  Trisalyn A Nelson,et al.  A critical examination of indices of dynamic interaction for wildlife telemetry studies. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[94]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Habitat selection during ungulate dispersal and exploratory movement at broad and fine scale with implications for conservation management , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[95]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Diet quality in a wild grazer declines under the threat of an ambush predator , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[96]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography , 2014 .

[97]  George Wittemyer,et al.  Novel opportunities for wildlife conservation and research with real-time monitoring. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[98]  Jonathan R. Potts,et al.  How do animal territories form and change? Lessons from 20 years of mechanistic modelling , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  H. Ernest,et al.  Individual Behaviors Dominate the Dynamics of an Urban Mountain Lion Population Isolated by Roads , 2014, Current Biology.

[100]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Logging‐induced changes in habitat network connectivity shape behavioral interactions in the wolf–caribou–moose system , 2014 .

[101]  Wolfgang Fiedler,et al.  Large frugivorous birds facilitate functional connectivity of fragmented landscapes , 2014 .

[102]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Earth observation satellite sensors for biodiversity monitoring: potentials and bottlenecks , 2014 .

[103]  Walter Jetz,et al.  An Assessment of Methods and Remote-Sensing Derived Covariates for Regional Predictions of 1 km Daily Maximum Air Temperature , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[104]  T. Alerstam,et al.  When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[105]  David M. Scantlebury,et al.  Flexible energetics of cheetah hunting strategies provide resistance against kleptoparasitism , 2014, Science.

[106]  Gabriel Hugh Elkaim,et al.  Instantaneous energetics of puma kills reveal advantage of felid sneak attacks , 2014, Science.

[107]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Movement-based analysis of interactions in African lions , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[108]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[109]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Territoriality and home-range dynamics in meerkats, Suricata suricatta: a mechanistic modelling approach. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[110]  TECHNOLOGY ON THE MOVE. , 2015, JEMS : a journal of emergency medical services.

[111]  Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf,et al.  Social information improves location prediction in the wild , 2015, AAAI 2015.