How Computational Models Predict the Behavior of Complex Systems

In this paper, we argue for the centrality of prediction in the use of computational models in science. We focus on the consequences of the irreversibility of computational models and on the conditional or ceteris paribus, nature of the kinds of their predictions. By irreversibility, we mean the fact that computational models can generally arrive at the same state via many possible sequences of previous states. Thus, while in the natural world, it is generally assumed that physical states have a unique history, representations of those states in a computational model will usually be compatible with more than one possible history in the model. We describe some of the challenges involved in prediction and retrodiction in computational models while arguing that prediction is an essential feature of non-arbitrary decision making. Furthermore, we contend that the non-predictive virtues of computational models are dependent to a significant degree on the predictive success of the models in question.

[1]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. , 1965 .

[2]  W. Suchting,et al.  Deductive Explanation and Prediction Revisited , 1967, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[4]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[5]  R. Parker Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[6]  N. Cartwright How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[7]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[8]  William Ascher The ambiguous nature of forecasts in project evaluation: Diagnosing the over-optimism of rate-of-return analysis , 1993 .

[9]  J. Crutchfield The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[10]  Andy W. Sheppard,et al.  Frontiers of population ecology , 1997 .

[11]  Kai N. Lee Appraising Adaptive Management , 1999 .

[12]  André E. Punt,et al.  Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures , 1999 .

[13]  Ronald D. Brunner Predictions and policy decisions , 1999 .

[14]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science , 1999 .

[15]  Jill S. Schneiderman The Earth Around Us: Maintaining A Livable Planet , 2000 .

[16]  Kai N. Lee Appraising Adaptive Management , 2000 .

[17]  P. Bates,et al.  Model Validation - Perspectives in Hydrological Science , 2001 .

[18]  Hideyuki Takagi Interactive Evolutionary Computation as Humanized Computational Intelligence Technology , 2001, Fuzzy Days.

[19]  Horritt,et al.  Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science , 2001 .

[20]  Francesco Guala,et al.  Models, Simulations, and Experiments , 2002 .

[21]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards a coherent philosophy for environmental modelling. , 2002 .

[22]  K. Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  P. Aligica Prediction, Explanation and the Epistemology of Future Studies , 2003 .

[24]  William K. Lauenroth,et al.  Models in Ecosystem Science , 2003, Models in Ecosystem Science.

[25]  Navot Israeli,et al.  Computational irreducibility and the predictability of complex physical systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[26]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Why there isn't a ready-made world , 1982, Synthese.

[27]  Dw Adams,et al.  Usable knowledge in public policy , 2004 .

[28]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  Fisheries Ecology and Management , 2004 .

[29]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[30]  C. S. Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[31]  F. Guala The Methodology of Experimental Economics: Bibliography , 2005 .

[32]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[33]  J. Hintikka Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning , 2007 .

[34]  Wendy S. Parker,et al.  Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality , 2009, Synthese.

[35]  Ian T. Carroll,et al.  Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? , 2008, Ecology.

[36]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[37]  Jim E Freer,et al.  Science versus politics: truth and uncertainty in predictive modelling , 2009 .

[38]  Roman Frigg,et al.  The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew? , 2009, Synthese.

[39]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Prediction, Retrodiction, and the Amount of Information Stored in the Present , 2009, ArXiv.

[40]  Catherine Allan,et al.  Adaptive Environmental Management: A Practitioner's Guide , 2009 .

[41]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Detecting behaviours in ecological models , 2010 .

[42]  A. Morelli Inverse Problem Theory , 2010 .

[43]  Roberto Poli,et al.  An introduction to the ontology of anticipation , 2010 .

[44]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  The role of science in decision making: does evidence‐based science drive environmental policy? , 2010 .

[45]  Francis Sullivan,et al.  Science in the Age of Computer Simulation , 2011 .

[46]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Modelling = conditional prediction , 2011 .