Elevated evolutionary rates in the laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

By using the maximum likelihood method, we made a genome-wide comparison of the evolutionary rates in the lineages leading to the laboratory strain (S288c) and a wild strain (YJM789) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and found that genes in the laboratory strain tend to evolve faster than in the wild strain. The pattern of elevated evolution suggests that relaxation of selection intensity is the dominant underlying reason, which is consistent with recurrent bottlenecks in the S. cerevisiae laboratory strain population. Supporting this conclusion are the following observations: (i) the increases in nonsynonymous evolutionary rate occur for genes in all functional categories; (ii) most of the synonymous evolutionary rate increases in S288c occur in genes with strong codon usage bias; (iii) genes under stronger negative selection have a larger increase in nonsynonymous evolutionary rate; and (iv) more genes with adaptive evolution were detected in the laboratory strain, but they do not account for the majority of the increased evolution. The present discoveries suggest that experimental and possible industrial manipulations of the laboratory strain of yeast could have had a strong effect on the genetic makeup of this model organism. Furthermore, they imply an evolution of laboratory model organisms away from their wild counterparts, questioning the relevancy of the models especially when extensive laboratory cultivation has occurred. In addition, these results shed light on the evolution of livestock and crop species that have been under human domestication for years.

[1]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  M. Stoneking,et al.  Nonneutral mitochondrial DNA variation in humans and chimpanzees. , 1996, Genetics.

[3]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[4]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  Z. Yang,et al.  Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  N. Moran.  Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.

[8]  T. Ohta.  Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clock , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[9]  A. Templeton,et al.  Contingency tests of neutrality using intra/interspecific gene trees: the rejection of neutrality for the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in the hominoid primates. , 1996, Genetics.

[10]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  T. Ohta,et al.  On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[12]  M. Nachman,et al.  Nonneutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[14]  T. Ohta.  THE NEARLY NEUTRAL THEORY OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION , 1992 .

[15]  L. Kann,et al.  Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. , 1994, Genetics.

[16]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Takeshi Itoh,et al.  Acceleration of genomic evolution caused by enhanced mutation rate in endocellular symbionts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[19]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[20]  J. Seger,et al.  Elevated rates of nonsynonymous substitution in island birds. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Jung-Eun Park,et al.  The possible mechanism of action of ciclopirox olamine in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Molecules and cells.

[22]  Anthony D Long,et al.  Evolutionary changes in heat-inducible gene expression in lines of Escherichia coli adapted to high temperature. , 2003, Physiological genomics.

[23]  C. Glover,et al.  Gene expression profiling for hematopoietic cell culture , 2006 .

[24]  T. Ohta.  Population size and rate of evolution , 1972, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  J R Johnston,et al.  Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. , 1986, Genetics.

[26]  S. Easteal,et al.  Departure from neutrality at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 gene in humans, but not in chimpanzees. , 1998, Genetics.

[27]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  Genetic diversity in yeast assessed with whole-genome oligonucleotide arrays. , 2003, Genetics.

[29]  B. Barrell,et al.  Life with 6000 Genes , 1996, Science.

[30]  H. Akashi,et al.  Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[31]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evidence for multiple adaptive peaks from populations of bacteria evolving in a structured habitat. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T. Ohta.  Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution , 1973, Nature.

[33]  F. Wright.  The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[34]  Ziheng Yang.  Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[35]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[36]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast , 2002, Nature.

[37]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC , 1993 .

[38]  Eduardo P C Rocha,et al.  An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  D. Hartl,et al.  Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome. , 1993, Genetics.

[40]  C. Papasian,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae pneumonia in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome , 1989, Journal of clinical microbiology.