Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability

Positron emission tomography imaging is affected by a number of resolution degrading phenomena, including positron range, photon non-collinearity and inter-crystal blurring. An approach to this issue is to model some or all of these effects within the image reconstruction task, referred to as resolution modeling (RM). This approach is commonly observed to yield images of higher resolution and subsequently contrast, and can be thought of as improving the modulation transfer function. Nonetheless, RM can substantially alter the noise distribution. In this work, we utilize noise propagation models in order to accurately characterize the noise texture of reconstructed images in the presence of RM. Furthermore we consider the task of lesion or defect detection, which is highly determined by the noise distribution as quantified using the noise power spectrum. Ultimately, we use this framework to demonstrate why conventional trade-off analyses (e.g. contrast versus noise, using simplistic noise metrics) do not provide a complete picture of the impact of RM and that improved performance of RM according to such analyses does not necessarily translate to the superiority of RM in detection task performance.

[1]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Information Theoretic Anatomical Priors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998 .

[3]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Direct 4D reconstruction of parametric images incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2010, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[4]  Accuracy and variability of quantitative measurements using PET with time-of-flight information and resolution modelling , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  M. King,et al.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  J C Froment,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic Data Corrected for Cortical Atrophy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1996, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[7]  H.C. Gifford,et al.  Evaluation of multiclass model observers in PET LROC studies , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[8]  Steven G. Ross,et al.  Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Collimator-Detector Response Compensation in SPECT , 2006 .

[12]  Michael Casey,et al.  Clinical impact of time-of-flight and point response modeling in PET reconstructions: a lesion detection study , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Motion frozen 18F-FDG cardiac PET , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[15]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimum compensation method and filter cutoff frequency in myocardial SPECT: a human observer study. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Resolution modeled PET image reconstruction incorporating space-variance of positron range: Rubidium-82 cardiac PET imaging , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[19]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  M E Phelps,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 3. Effect of Sampling , 1980, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Nodule polarity effects on detection and localization performance in liver CT images , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[22]  M E Raichle,et al.  Regional Correction of Positron Emission Tomography Data for the Effects of Cerebral Atrophy , 1988, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  Koon-Pong Wong,et al.  Quantitative Functional Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography: Principles and Instrumentation , 2005 .

[24]  Xin He,et al.  Toward Realistic and Practical Ideal Observer (IO) Estimation for the Optimization of Medical Imaging Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Geometry Study of a High Resolution PET Detection System Using Small Detectors , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[26]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Evaluation of a 3D local multiresolution algorithm for the correction of partial volume effects in positron emission tomography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[27]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A Bayesian Joint Mixture Framework for the Integration of Anatomical Information in Functional Image Reconstruction , 2000, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[28]  D Visvikis,et al.  A multiresolution image based approach for correction of partial volume effects in emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Jonathan M. Links,et al.  MR-Based Correction of Brain PET Measurements for Heterogeneous Gray Matter Radioactivity Distribution , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  S. Libutti,et al.  Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  J. Nuyts The use of mutual information and joint entropy for anatomical priors in emission tomography , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[33]  P.E. Kinahan,et al.  Pragmatic image reconstruction for the MiCES Fully-3D mouse imaging PET scanner , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[34]  P. Guignard,et al.  A comparative method based on ROC analysis for the quantitation of observer performance in scintigraphy. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Michael A. King,et al.  Evaluating detector resolution compensation methods in SPECT imaging through numerical observer ROC and human observer LROC , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[36]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[37]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Partial Volume Correction: Estimation and Algorithms , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[40]  Jing Tang,et al.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  M Defrise,et al.  Non-Gaussian space-variant resolution modelling for list-mode reconstruction , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  P F Judy,et al.  Visualization and detection-localization on computed tomographic images. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[45]  S R Cherry,et al.  An improved analytical detector response function model for multilayer small-diameter PET scanners. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Gianluigi Zanetti,et al.  Multi-ray-based system matrix generation for 3D PET reconstruction , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  H. Barrett,et al.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[48]  Michael A. King,et al.  LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[50]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Analytic system matrix resolution modeling in PET: An application to Rb-82 cardiac imaging , 2008, ISBI.

[51]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[52]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 5. Physical–Anatomical Effects , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[53]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[54]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[55]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Optimization of Rb-82 PET acquisition and reconstruction protocols for myocardial perfusion defect detection , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[56]  Jing Tang,et al.  Direct 4D reconstruction of parametric images incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[57]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Statistical Efficiency Of Perceptual Decisions , 1984, Other Conferences.

[58]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Functional and structural synergy for resolution recovery and partial volume correction in brain PET , 2009, NeuroImage.

[59]  K Thielemans,et al.  Image-based point spread function implementation in a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm for PET , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[60]  Charles L. Byrne,et al.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms. I. Theory , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[61]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  List mode EM reconstruction of Compton scatter camera images in 3-D , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[62]  A. Kirov,et al.  Partial volume effect correction in PET using regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on local topology , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[63]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[64]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  R. Leahy,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided positron emission tomography image reconstruction. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[66]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Functional and structural synergy for resolution recovery and partial volume correction in brain PET , 2009, NeuroImage.

[67]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[68]  R. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[69]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[70]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Megalopinakophobia: its symptoms and cures , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[71]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[72]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[73]  R.M. Leahy,et al.  Evaluation of MAP image reconstruction with positron range modeling for 3D PET , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[74]  Walter Oberschelp,et al.  Expectation maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[75]  Koichiro Abe,et al.  Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[76]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Evaluation of a 3 D local multi-resolution algorithm for the correction of partial volume effects in positron emission tomography , 2011 .

[77]  R. Laforest,et al.  Positron range modeling for statistical PET image reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[78]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Measurement of Radiotracer Concentration in Brain Gray Matter Using Positron Emission Tomography: MRI-Based Correction for Partial Volume Effects , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[79]  A. Jackson,et al.  Single scan parameterization of space-variant point spread functions in image space via a printed array: the impact for two PET/CT scanners , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[80]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  DIRECT 4D RECONSTRUCTION OF PARAMETRIC IMAGES INCORPORATING , 2008 .

[81]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[82]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[83]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges , 2008, Nuclear medicine communications.

[84]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: Theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. , 2013, Medical physics.

[85]  Vesna Sossi,et al.  Scanning rats on the high resolution research tomograph (HRRT): a comparison study with a dedicated micro-PET. , 2012, Medical physics.

[86]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Space-variant and anisotropic resolution modeling in list-mode EM reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[87]  Yong Du,et al.  Partial volume effect compensation for quantitative brain SPECT imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[88]  Bing Bai,et al.  Three-dimensional maximum a posteriori (MAP) imaging with radiopharmaceuticals labeled with three Cu radionuclides. , 2006, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[89]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[90]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[91]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Comparison of radially-symmetric versus oriented channel. Models using channelized hotelling observers for myocardial defect detection in parallel-hole SPECT , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[92]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Improved noise propagation in statistical image reconstruction with resolution modeling , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[93]  Lin Fu,et al.  A residual correction method for high-resolution PET reconstruction with application to on-the-fly Monte Carlo based model of positron range. , 2010, Medical physics.

[94]  A. Evans,et al.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[95]  D. Lalush,et al.  Comparison of Hotelling observer models and human observers in defect detection from myocardial SPECT imaging , 1999 .

[96]  Val J Lowe,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[97]  T Mizowaki,et al.  The geometric accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6D robotic couch system , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[98]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Pragmatic fully 3D image reconstruction for the MiCES mouse imaging PET scanner. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[99]  C.A. Bouman,et al.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[100]  P F Judy,et al.  LESION DETECTION AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN CT IMAGES , 1981, Medical physics.

[101]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[102]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Partial Volume Correction Strategies in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[103]  L. MacDonald,et al.  Spatially variant positron range modeling derived from CT for PET image reconstruction , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[104]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  One-pass list-mode EM algorithm for high-resolution 3-D PET image reconstruction into large arrays , 2002 .

[105]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  A Practical, Automated Quality Assurance Method for Measuring Spatial Resolution in PET , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.