A Urine-based DNA Methylation Marker Test to Detect Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose: We explored the accuracy of a urine-based epigenetic test for detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Under an Institutional Review Board–approved protocol, urine samples were prospectively collected from primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients before radical nephroureterectomy, ureterectomy, or ureteroscopy between December 2019 and March 2022. Samples were analyzed with Bladder CARE, a urine-based test that measures the methylation levels of 3 cancer biomarkers (TRNA-Cys, SIM2, and NKX1-1) and 2 internal control loci using methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes coupled with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results were reported as the Bladder CARE Index score and quantitatively categorized as positive (>5), high risk (2.5-5), or negative (<2.5). The findings were compared with those of 1:1 sex/age-matched cancer-free healthy individuals. Results: Fifty patients (40 radical nephroureterectomy, 7 ureterectomy, and 3 ureteroscopy) with a median (IQR) age of 72 (64-79) years were included. Bladder CARE Index results were positive in 47, high risk in 1, and negative in 2 patients. A significant correlation was found between Bladder CARE Index values and tumor size. Urine cytology was available for 35 patients, of whom 22 (63%) results were false-negative. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients had significantly higher Bladder CARE Index values compared to the controls (mean 189.3 vs 1.6, P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Bladder CARE test for detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma were 96%, 88%, 89%, and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: Bladder CARE is an accurate urine-based epigenetic test for the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with much higher sensitivity than standard urine cytology.

[1]  F. Algaba,et al.  DNA Methylation Urine Biomarkers Test in the Diagnosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Single-Center Prospective Clinical Trial , 2022, The Journal of urology.

[2]  H. Djaladat,et al.  The Challenges of Urological Research in COVID-19 Era: Lessons Learned for Immediate Response to the Pandemic , 2022, Urology.

[3]  Risk Factors for Intravesical Recurrence after Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (ROBUUST Collaboration). Erratum. , 2022, The Journal of urology.

[4]  T. Cenci,et al.  Upper urothelial tract High Grade Carcinoma: Comparison of Urine Cytology and DNA Methylation Analysis in Urinary Samples. , 2021, Human pathology.

[5]  E. Rammant,et al.  The incidence and prevalence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review , 2021, BMC Urology.

[6]  R. Autorino,et al.  Risk Factors for Intravesical Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Nephroureterctomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (Robuust Collaboration). , 2021, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Bhasin,et al.  Clinical evaluation of Bladder CARE, a new epigenetic test for bladder cancer detection in urine samples , 2021, Clinical epigenetics.

[8]  C. VandenBussche,et al.  A review of urinary cytology in the setting of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. , 2020, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.

[9]  A. Breda,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of ureteroscopic biopsy in predicting stage and grade at final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  A. Masson-Lecomte,et al.  European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. , 2020, European urology.

[11]  K. Duesing,et al.  DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic , 2019, Front. Genet..

[12]  Xueying Li,et al.  Detection of urothelial carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma with gross hematuria using selected urine-DNA methylation biomarkers: A prospective, single-center study. , 2018, Urologic oncology.

[13]  R. Autorino,et al.  Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy on intravesical recurrence in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, BJU international.

[14]  M. Babjuk,et al.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  D. Weisenberger,et al.  Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in Bladder Cancer , 2016, International neurourology journal.

[16]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Diagnostic Utility of Selective Upper Tract Urinary Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature. , 2016, Urology.

[17]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic biomarkers and clinical factors in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. , 2015, Epigenomics.

[18]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  A Panel of Three Markers Hyper- and Hypomethylated in Urine Sediments Accurately Predicts Bladder Cancer Recurrence , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  L. Antunes,et al.  Accurate detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in tissue and urine by means of quantitative GDF15, TMEFF2 and VIM promoter methylation. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[20]  E. Zwarthoff,et al.  DNA methylation-based biomarkers in bladder cancer , 2013, Nature Reviews Urology.

[21]  David A. Green,et al.  Stage-specific impact of tumor location on oncologic outcomes in patients with upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma following radical surgery. , 2012, European urology.

[22]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high‐grade upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma , 2011, BJU international.

[23]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  Unique DNA methylation patterns distinguish noninvasive and invasive urothelial cancers and establish an epigenetic field defect in premalignant tissue. , 2010, Cancer research.

[24]  S. Hirohashi,et al.  Genome‐wide DNA methylation profiles in urothelial carcinomas and urothelia at the precancerous stage , 2010, Cancer science.

[25]  Ishtiaq Rehman,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.