Audibility-Index Functions for the Connected Speech Test
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .
[2] Gerald A Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Frequency Importance Function for Isolated Words and for Conversation of Female Talkers , 1964 .
[4] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[5] C. P. Janota,et al. Frequency importance functions for words, sentences, and continuous discourse. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[6] R M Cox,et al. Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] G A Studebaker,et al. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[8] L Magnusson. Speech intelligibility index transfer functions and speech spectra for two Swedish speech recognition tests. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.
[9] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] R M Cox,et al. The Connected Speech Test version 3: audiovisual administration. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[11] R M Cox,et al. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[12] G A Studebaker,et al. The effect of noise spectrum on speech recognition performance-intensity functions. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[13] G. Studebaker,et al. Speech Spectra for Six Recorded Monosyllabic Word Tests , 1993, Ear and hearing.
[14] D D Dirks,et al. Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[15] B Hagerman,et al. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.
[16] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[17] R M Cox,et al. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[18] D D Dirks,et al. Subjective judgements of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[19] Gerald A. Studebaker,et al. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance , 1992 .
[20] C V Pavlovic,et al. A frequency importance function for continuous discourse. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] G A Studebaker,et al. Evaluating relative speech recognition performance using the proficiency factor and rationalized arcsine differences. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[22] G A Studebaker,et al. Prediction and statistical evaluation of speech recognition test scores. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[23] R M Cox,et al. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. , 1988, Ear and hearing.
[24] G. Studebaker,et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] C V Pavlovic,et al. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] G A Studebaker,et al. Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[27] R M Cox,et al. Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: application to hearing aid selection. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] G A Studebaker,et al. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[29] Graeme M. Clark,et al. A frequency importance function for a new monosyllabic word test , 1998 .
[30] Robyn M. Cox,et al. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST) , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[31] John Fletcher,et al. Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .