Staging amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A new focus on progression.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heterogenous motoneuronal neurodegenerative condition with a panel of phenotypes exhibiting different clinical patterns. Two compounds are currently available for the treatment of ALS but the majority of trials have failed to show a positive effect on prognosis. One of the explanations which could be put forward involves the way efficacy is evaluated: clinicians agree that the ALSFRS-revised scale used in all trials does not fit with highlighting a positive effect. So, the development and validation of new tools allowing a reliable assessment of ALS has become a key issue in clinical research. Over the last three years, two functional scales (the King's College and MiToS staging systems) have been proposed. These scales rely on two different approaches to ALS: an anatomical and prognostic concept, and loss of autonomy. Both scales propose five stages. We will discuss below the contribution of these two scales to clinical evaluation and the questions which remain to be resolved in the future.

[1]  H. Braak,et al.  Cognitive phenotypes of sequential staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2018, Cortex.

[2]  T. Hanafusa,et al.  Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS , 2006, Neurology.

[3]  W. Robberecht,et al.  The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[4]  A. Chiò,et al.  Development and evaluation of a clinical staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2013, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[5]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  Comparison of the King’s and MiToS staging systems for ALS , 2017, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[6]  D. Consonni,et al.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a comparison of two staging systems in a population‐based study , 2016, European journal of neurology.

[7]  Lucette Lacomblez,et al.  Progression in ALS is not linear but is curvilinear , 2010, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  Robert H. Brown,et al.  Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  Use of clinical staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for phase 3 clinical trials , 2014, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  Ahmad Al Khleifat,et al.  Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[11]  A. Chiò,et al.  The MITOS system predicts long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  John Q. Trojanowski,et al.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—a model of corticofugal axonal spread , 2013, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[13]  F. Torny,et al.  Échelles fonctionnelles de la sclérose latérale amyotrophique , 2006 .

[14]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  A proposed staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Jung A Kim,et al.  Socioeconomic costs of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis according to staging system , 2015, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[16]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  Health utility decreases with increasing clinical stage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2014, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[17]  G. Giovannoni,et al.  Immune reactivity to neurofilament proteins in the clinical staging of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2013, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[18]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  Estimating clinical stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from the ALS Functional Rating Scale , 2014, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.