Effect of TEGDMA/BisGMA Ratio on Stress Development and Viscoelastic Properties of Experimental Two-paste Composites

In this study, we explored the reduction of shrinkage stresses in restored teeth by stimulating viscous flow of adhesive restoratives during curing, by increasing the TEGDMA/BisGMA ratio in the resin of composite restoratives. We studied a series of experimental two-paste composites with different amounts of TEGDMA (30, 50, 70 wt%, respectively) in the resin by mechanical testing, infrared spectroscopy, and dilatometry, to determine how comonomer composition affects the mechanical and chemical properties of the composite during curing. It was found that the polymerization rate of BisGMA-TEGDMA composites is indicative of the viscoelastic behavior during curing: The higher the reactivity, the higher the stiffness and viscosity development. Composites with 50 wt% TEGDMA in the resin displayed the highest maximum polymerization rate. High amounts of TEGDMA in the resin only modestly increased the pre-gel viscous flow (= lowered viscosity) property of composites. Of these composites, high post-gel shrinkage is the decisive factor in high shrinkage stress development.

[1]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  James E. Moore PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL ACRYLATES AND METHACRYLATES , 1977 .

[3]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[4]  G. Cowperthwaite,et al.  The Nature of the Crosslinking Matrix Found in Dental Composite Filling Materials and Sealants , 1981 .

[5]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Visco-elastic Parameters of Dental Restorative Materials during Setting , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[6]  W. Geurtsen,et al.  Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[7]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. , 1997, European journal of oral sciences.

[8]  D B Mahler,et al.  Increased wall to wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[9]  C. Davidson,et al.  A modified dilatometer for continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. , 1981, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  C. Bowman,et al.  The Effects of Light Intensity, Temperature, and Comonomer Composition on the Polymerization Behavior of Dimethacrylate Dental Resins , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[11]  J. Ferracane,et al.  The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  M. Aarnts,et al.  Modeling of viscoelastic behavior of dental chemically activated resin composites during curing. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  G. Schuster,et al.  A comparison of monomer conversion and inorganic filler content in visible light-cured denture resins. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  R. Kusy,et al.  Comparison of water sorption by methacrylate and dimethacrylate monomers and their corresponding polymers , 1991 .

[15]  J. Ferracane Elution of leachable components from composites. , 1994, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Polymeric materials for composite matrices in biological environments , 1993 .

[17]  G. Challa Polymer Chemistry: An Introduction , 1993 .

[18]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.