Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions

Crosslinguistically, questions frequently make crucial use of morphosyntactic elements which also occur outside of questions. Chief among these are focus, disjunctions, and wh-words with indefinite semantics. This paper provides a compositional account of the semantics of wh-, alternative, and polar questions in Yucatec Maya (YM), which are composed primarily of these elements. Key to the account is a theory of disjunctions and indefinites (extending work by others) which recognizes the inherently inquisitive nature of these elements. While disjunctions and indefinites are inquisitive, they differ from questions since they are also truth-conditionally informative. Compositionally, then, the role of focus in YM questions is to presuppose the informative component of an indefinite wh-word or disjunction, rendering the inquisitive component the question’s only new contribution to the discourse. In addition to deriving question denotations compositionally, the account also captures a potentially surprising fact: focused disjunctions in YM can function as either questions or assertions, depending solely on the discourse context.

[1]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[2]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Disjunction in Alternative Semantics , 2010 .

[3]  Scott AnderBois,et al.  Issues and alternatives , 2011 .

[4]  Heriberto Avelino Becerra.  Intonational patterns of topic and focus constructions in Yucatec Maya , 2011 .

[5]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Negation and Disjunction in Discourse Representation Theory , 1995, J. Semant..

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[7]  Andreas Haida,et al.  The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Question Words , 2008 .

[8]  Judith Tonhauser,et al.  Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content , 2011 .

[9]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Interpreting focus , 2004 .

[10]  John D. Lynch,et al.  16. Coordination in Oceanic languages and Proto Oceanic , 2004 .

[11]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Interpreting focus again , 2004 .

[12]  Philippe Schlenker.  Scopal Independence: A Note on Branching and Wide Scope Readings of Indefinites and Disjunctions , 2006, J. Semant..

[13]  Francis Edward Gladstone,et al.  Theme with Variations , 1873 .

[14]  R.A.M. van Rooij.  Modal Subordination in Questions , 1998 .

[15]  Frank Kügler,et al.  Encoding Information Structure in Yucatec Maya: On the Interplay of Prosody and Syntax * , 2007 .

[16]  Russell Ultan,et al.  Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems. Working Papers on Language Universals, No. 1. , 1969 .

[17]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[18]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of disjunction , 1998 .

[19]  Kim B. Bruce,et al.  On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions , 2010, J. Semant..

[20]  L. Karttunen.  Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[21]  S. Anderbois.  Strong Positions and Laryngeal Features in Yukatek Maya , 2011 .

[22]  Maribel Romero,et al.  On Negative Yes/No Questions , 2004 .

[23]  Irene Heim,et al.  FREE CHOICE DISJUNCTION AND EPISTEMIC POSSIBILITY* , 2001 .

[24]  M. Simons.  Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal/or interaction , 2005 .

[25]  C. L. Hamblin.  QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[26]  R. Eckardt.  INHERENT FOCUS ON WH-PHRASES , 2007 .

[27]  S. Anderbois,et al.  Non-interrogative questions in Yukatek Maya , 2009 .

[28]  Sigrid Beck,et al.  Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation* , 2006 .

[29]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics: Two Possibilities for Disjunction , 2009, TbiLLC.

[30]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[31]  Sigrid Beck,et al.  Intervention Effects in Alternative Questions , 2007 .

[32]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[33]  Ivano Ciardelli,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics and Intermediate Logics. , 2009 .

[34]  B. Geurts.  Entertaining Alternatives: Disjunctions as Modals , 2005 .

[35]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition , 2007 .

[36]  Maria Aloni,et al.  FREE CHOICE IN MODAL CONTEXTS , 2003 .

[37]  Salvador Mascarenhas,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics and Logic , 2009 .

[38]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives , 2010, J. Semant..

[39]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Attention! 'Might' in Inquisitive Semantics , 2009 .

[40]  K. Kiss.  Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[41]  Seth Cable.  The Grammar of Q , 2010 .

[42]  Utpal Lahiri,et al.  Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts , 2002 .

[43]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[44]  Scott AnderBois,et al.  Sluicing as anaphora to issues , 2010 .

[45]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics , 2009 .

[46]  Christine A. Gunlogson.  True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English , 2003 .

[47]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  A moraic and a syllabic H-tone in Yucatec Maya , 2007 .

[48]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A pragmatic analysis of tautological utternances , 1991 .

[49]  Predication and specification in the syntax of cleft sentences , 2013 .

[50]  Emiel Krahmer.  Presupposition and Anaphora , 1998 .

[51]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  STRUCTURED NOMINAL AND MODAL REFERENCE , 2008 .

[52]  Andreas Haida,et al.  The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words , 2008 .

[53]  D. R. Ladd,et al.  A First Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Negative Questions and Tag Questions , 1981 .

[54]  Chung-chieh Shan.  Binding Alongside Hamblin Alternatives Calls for Variable-free Semantics , 2004 .