Space and scale in socio-technical transitions

The multi-level perspective (MLP) is a widely adopted framework for analysing stability, change and transitions in socio-technical systems. Key to explanations of change is the interaction between nested levels (niche, regime, landscape) constituting socio-technical systems over time. This paper proposes a second generation, multi-scalar MLP that explicitly incorporates a spatial scale. Recent developments in innovation studies and contributions from regional studies and geography are reviewed. We draw on notions of space as being relational, fluid and contested by institutionally situated actors. Dynamics in socio-technical systems are explained not only by interactions between modes of structuration and developments over time, but also by interactions between actors and institutions situated across different levels of spatial scale. The paper explores the kinds of insights that might emerge from adopting a second generation MLP to socio-technical systems with a case study of biomass gasification in India.

[1]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[2]  T. Bunnell,et al.  Spaces and scales of innovation , 2001 .

[3]  M. Betsill,et al.  Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the 'Urban' Politics of Climate Change , 2005 .

[4]  P. D. Grover,et al.  Development and field testing of small biomass gasifier-engine systems in india: A joint project by an american and indian team , 1989 .

[5]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[6]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-cognitive evolution and co-evolution in competing technical trajectories: Biogas development in Denmark (1970–2002) , 2007 .

[7]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[8]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[9]  Harvey Molotch,et al.  The Regional World , 1998 .

[10]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system , 2008 .

[11]  D. Massey,et al.  Human geography today , 1999 .

[12]  J. Howells,et al.  The Internationalization of R & D and the Development of Global Research Networks , 1990 .

[13]  P. Saunier.  Learning by Doing: Notes about the Making of the Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History , 2008 .

[14]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[15]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[16]  P. Sunley,et al.  Relational Economic Geography: A Partial Understanding or a New Paradigm? , 2008 .

[17]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[18]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[19]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[20]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[21]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Strategic Niche Management in an unstable regime: biomass gasification in India. , 2010 .

[22]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[23]  H. Romijn,et al.  The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid , 2012 .

[24]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[25]  H. Yeung.  Rethinking relational economic geography , 2005 .

[26]  R. Raven,et al.  Avoiding environmental convergence : a possible role for sustainability experiments in latecomer countries? , 2011 .

[27]  Pinakeswar Mahanta,et al.  Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective , 2010 .

[28]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality* , 2002 .

[29]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[30]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? , 1999 .

[31]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[32]  D. Massey.  Spatial Divisions of Labour , 1995 .

[33]  Per Högselius,et al.  Resisting change? : the transnational dynamics of European energy regimes , 2012 .

[34]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Power in Transition: Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions , 2006 .

[35]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[36]  Johan Schot,et al.  The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century , 1998 .

[37]  G. Verbong,et al.  Governing the Energy Transition. Reality, Illusion or Necessity , 2012 .

[38]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Cities mediating technological transitions: understanding visions, intermediation and consequences , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  M. Hess.  ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness , 2004 .

[40]  M. Lawhon,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[41]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[42]  U. Jørgensen.  Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development , 2012 .

[43]  N. Thrift,et al.  Neo‐Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks* , 1992 .

[44]  Michael G. Müller,et al.  Conceptualising transnational spaces in history , 2009 .

[45]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[46]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in biofuels development: a critical comparison of the Netherlands and Sweden , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[47]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Cities and Low Carbon Transitions , 2010 .

[48]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[49]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[50]  D. Ernst,et al.  Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion and Local Capability Formation , 2002 .

[51]  ScienceDirect,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions , 2011 .

[52]  K. Cox.  Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics , 1998 .

[53]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2004 .

[54]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[55]  Michele M. Betsill,et al.  Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change , 2006, Understanding Global Cooperation.

[56]  A. Amin.  Spatialities of Globalisation , 2002 .

[57]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003) , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[58]  H. Yeung,et al.  Global production networks and the analysis of economic development , 2002 .

[59]  Sampsa Hyysalo.  Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts , 2010 .

[60]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: a theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages , 2010 .

[61]  Jeff Boggs,et al.  The ‘relational turn’ in economic geography , 2003 .

[62]  J. Michie,et al.  Globalisation and Economic Performance1 , 2002 .

[63]  Joanna I. Lewis.  Technology Acquisition and Innovation in the Developing World: Wind Turbine Development in China and India , 2007 .

[64]  M. Hodson,et al.  Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? , 2010 .

[65]  Jochen Monstadt.  Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies , 2009 .

[66]  J. Meadowcroft.  What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[67]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation , 1990 .

[68]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[69]  P. Dicken,et al.  ‘Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective , 2004 .

[70]  N. Thrift,et al.  Living In The Global , 1994 .

[71]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[72]  Doreen Massey,et al.  Geographies of responsibility , 2004 .

[73]  N. Brenner.  The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration , 2001 .

[74]  E. V. D. Vleuten,et al.  Toward a Transnational History of Technology: Meanings, Promises, Pitfalls , 2008 .

[75]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets , 2012 .