A cost-effective, non-invasive system for pressure monitoring during epidural needle insertion: Design, development and bench tests

Epidural blockade procedures have gained large acceptance during last decades. However, the insertion of the needle during epidural blockade procedures is challenging, and there is an increasing alarming risk in accidental dural puncture. One of the most popular approaches to minimize the mentioned risk is to detect the epidural space on the base of the loss of resistance (LOR) during the epidural needle insertion. The aim of this paper is to illustrate an innovative and non-invasive system able to monitor the pressure exerted during the epidural blockade procedure in order to detect the LOR. The system is based on a Force Sensing Resistor (FSR) sensor arranged on the top of the syringe's plunger. Such a sensor is able to register the resistance opposed to the needle by the different tissues transducing the pressure exerted on the plunger into a change of an electrical resistance. Hence, on the base of a peculiar algorithm, the system automatically detects LOR providing visual and acoustic feedbacks to the operator improving the safety of the procedure. Experiments have been performed to characterize the measurement device and to validate the whole system. Notice that the proposed solution is able to perform an effective detection of the LOR.

[1]  T. Lechner,et al.  Clinical results with a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[2]  Edward T Riley,et al.  The Episure syringe: a novel loss of resistance syringe for locating the epidural space. , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  Terrence K. Allen,et al.  A Pilot Study to Compare the EpisureTM AutodetectTM Syringe With the Glass Syringe for Identification of the Epidural Space in Parturients , 2008 .

[4]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Instrumentation of the Loss-of-Resistance Technique for Epidural Needle Insertion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  R. Finlayson,et al.  Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks , 2015, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[6]  E Schena,et al.  Bronchial blockers under pressure: in vitro model and ex vivo model. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Catton Dv,et al.  Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. , 1969 .

[8]  T. Lechner,et al.  The use of a sound‐enabled device to measure pressure during insertion of an epidural catheter in women in labour , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[9]  Sergio Silvestri,et al.  Design and characterization of a measurement system for monitoring pressure exerted by bronchial blockers: In vitro trials , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  A. Habib,et al.  A Pilot Study to Compare the Episure™ Autodetect™ Syringe with the Glass Syringe for Identification of the Epidural Space in Parturients , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  J L Shah,et al.  Identification of the epidural space. , 1991, British journal of hospital medicine.

[12]  C M Wait,et al.  Identification of the epidural space , 1987, Anaesthesia.

[13]  Lloyd R Saberski,et al.  Identification of the Epidural Space: Is Loss of Resistance to Air a Safe Technique?: A Review of the Complications Related to the Use of Air , 1997, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[14]  G. Niraj,et al.  Comparison of analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery , 2011, Anaesthesia.