On the Performance of Co-existence between Public eMBB and Non-public URLLC Networks

To ensure the high level of automation required in today’s industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a public enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and a local non-public factory (URLLC) network and evaluate the network conditions under which the stringent latency and reliability requirements of factory automation applications are met. The evaluations consider both an unsynchronized and a synchronized time division duplexing (TDD) deployment between the networks, as well as scenarios both with and without any macro eMBB traffic located inside the factory. The results show that an unsynchronized deployment is possible if the isolation between the networks is sufficiently high, either as a result of a separation distance, wall loss or the use of separate frequencies for the networks. A synchronized deployment will avoid the cross-link interference, but it will not resolve the problems related to the closed access and the near-far interference. If the factory contains eMBB traffic served by the overlaid macro cells, the performance of both networks will suffer due to a high level of cross-link and near-far interference. The problems related to the cross-link interference can be resolved by synchronizing the networks, while the level of the near-far interference can be reduced by allowing the eMBB users to be connected to base stations located inside the factory. Finally, if an unsynchronized deployment is desired, the factory should be deployed on an isolated frequency.

[1]  Anders Furuskar,et al.  Outdoor-to-indoor coverage in high frequency bands , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[2]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Small cell dynamic TDD transmissions in heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[3]  Robert Baldemair,et al.  5G Radio Network Design for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication , 2018, IEEE Network.

[4]  Yu Cheng,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of MAC Protocol for LTE-U Co-Existing with Wi-Fi , 2014, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[5]  Sachin Sharma,et al.  Coexistence between 5G and Fixed Services , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  Sangki Yun,et al.  Supporting WiFi and LTE co-existence , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[7]  Braham Himed,et al.  Interference Mitigation Processing for Spectrum-Sharing Between Radar and Wireless Communications Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Joint Power Allocation for Radar and Communication Co-Existence , 2019, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Salama Ikki,et al.  Spectrum-Sharing Method for Co-Existence Between 5G OFDM-Based System and Fixed Service , 2019, IEEE Access.

[10]  Kimmo Hiltunen,et al.  Performance Evaluation for the Co-Existence of eMBB and URLLC Networks: Synchronized versus Unsynchronized TDD , 2019, 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall).

[11]  Chang Wen Chen,et al.  Resource Allocation in Dynamic TDD Heterogeneous Networks under Mixed Traffic , 2016, ArXiv.