New Architecture for High‐Efficiency Polymer Photovoltaic Cells Using Solution‐Based Titanium Oxide as an Optical Spacer

reported under AM1.5 (AM: air mass) illumination, this efficiency is not sufficient to meet realistic specifications for commercialization. The need to improve the light-to-electricity conversion efficiency requires the implementation of new materials and the exploration of new device architectures. Polymer-based photovoltaic cells are thin-film devices fabricated in the metal-insulator-metal configuration sketched in Figure 1a. The absorbing and charge-separating bulk-heterojunction layer with a thickness of approximately 100 nm is sandwiched between two charge-selective electrodes; a transparent bilayer electrode comprising poly(3,4-ethylenedioxylenethiophene):polystyrene sulfonic acid (PEDOT:PSS) on indium tin oxide (ITO) glass for collecting the holes and a lower-work-function metal (here, Al) for collecting the electrons. The work-function difference between the two electrodes provides a built-in potential that breaks the symmetry, thereby providing a driving force for the photogenerated electrons and holes toward their respective electrodes. Because of optical interference between the incident (from the ITO side) and back-reflected light, the intensity of the light is zero at the metallic (Al) electrode; Figure 1a shows a schematic representation of the spatial distribution of the squared optical electric-field strength. [9–11] Thus, a relatively large fraction of the active layer is in a dead-zone in which the photogeneration of carriers is significantly reduced. Moreover, this effect causes more electron–hole pairs to be produced near the ITO/PEDOT:PSS electrode, a distribution which is known to reduce the photovoltaic conversion efficiency. [12,13] This “optical interference effect” is especially important for thin-film structures where layer thicknesses are comparable to the absorption depth and the wavelength of the incident light, as is the case for photovoltaic cells fabricated from semiconducting polymers. In order to overcome these problems, one might simply increase the thickness of the active layer to absorb more light. Because of the low mobility of the charge carriers in the polymer:C60 composites, however, the increased internal resistance of thicker films will inevitably lead to a reduced fill factor. An alternative approach is to change the device architecture with the goal of spatially redistributing the light intensity inside the device by introducing an optical spacer between the active layer and the Al electrode as sketched in Figure 1a. [11] Although this revised architecture would appear to solve the problem, the prerequisites for an ideal optical spacer limit the choice of materials: the layer must be a good acceptor and an electron-transport material with a conduction band edge lower in energy than that of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of C60; the LUMO must be above (or close to) the Fermi energy of the collecting metal electrode; and it must be transparent to light with wavelengths within the solar spectrum.

[1]  S. Carter,et al.  Charge transport inTiO2/MEH−PPVpolymer photovoltaics , 2001 .

[2]  Hans-Werner Schmidt,et al.  Fully Vapor-Deposited Thin-Layer Titanium Dioxide Solar Cells , 2002 .

[3]  L. S. Roman,et al.  Modeling photocurrent action spectra of photovoltaic devices based on organic thin films , 1999 .

[4]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Organic photovoltaics: technology and market , 2004 .

[5]  Kwanghee Lee,et al.  Optical spectroscopic characterization of plasma-polymerized thin films , 2003 .

[6]  C. Brabec,et al.  Plastic Solar Cells , 2001 .

[7]  Wolfgang Brütting,et al.  Exciton diffusion and optical interference in organic donor–acceptor photovoltaic cells , 2001 .

[8]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films , 1991, Nature.

[9]  Xiong Gong,et al.  Thermally Stable, Efficient Polymer Solar Cells with Nanoscale Control of the Interpenetrating Network Morphology , 2005 .

[10]  J. Hummelen,et al.  Polymer Photovoltaic Cells: Enhanced Efficiencies via a Network of Internal Donor-Acceptor Heterojunctions , 1995, Science.

[11]  R. Friend,et al.  The Origin of Collected Charge and Open‐Circuit Voltage in Blended Polyfluorene Photovoltaic Devices , 2004 .

[12]  Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci,et al.  Effects of Postproduction Treatment on Plastic Solar Cells , 2003 .

[13]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Optical and Electronic Contributions in Double‐Heterojunction Organic Thin‐Film Solar Cells , 2003 .

[14]  Valentin D. Mihailetchi,et al.  Hole Transport in Poly(phenylene vinylene)/Methanofullerene Bulk‐Heterojunction Solar Cells , 2004 .

[15]  Josef Salbeck,et al.  Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Hans-Heinrich Hörhold,et al.  Efficient Titanium Oxide/Conjugated Polymer Photovoltaics for Solar Energy Conversion , 2000 .

[17]  A. J. Heeger,et al.  Photoinduced Electron Transfer from a Conducting Polymer to Buckminsterfullerene , 1992, Science.

[18]  Lenneke H. Slooff,et al.  Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Photovoltaic Response of a MDMO‐PPV:TiO2 Bulk‐Heterojunction , 2003 .

[19]  David L. Carroll,et al.  High-efficiency photovoltaic devices based on annealed poly(3-hexylthiophene) and 1-(3-methoxycarbonyl)-propyl-1- phenyl-(6,6)C61 blends , 2005 .

[20]  C. Brabec,et al.  2.5% efficient organic plastic solar cells , 2001 .