Marshallian Localization Economies: Where Do They Come From and To Whom Do They Flow?

Dense concentrations of economic activity are generally seen as giving rise to increasing returns that may be shared by business units that cluster in particular locations. What are the sources of these increasing returns and do they benefit all businesses or only some? Theories of the firm and strategic management argue that competitive advantage originates in the development and exploitation of firm-specific assets or capabilities that may be internal or external to the firm. The extent of firm heterogeneity suggests that businesses search for profit in many different ways. We might anticipate that older, larger, foreign-owned and multi-plant firms draw upon internal resources more readily than young, small, domestic, single-plant firms. Do the benefits of agglomeration vary among business establishments according to these characteristics? We examine this question using plant-level longitudinal micro-data from the Canadian manufacturing sector. We show that most manufacturing plants benefit from co-location, but that plants with different characteristics benefit in different ways.

[1]  Gilles Duranton,et al.  California Dreamin’: The Feeble Case for Cluster Policies , 2011, Review of Economic Analysis.

[2]  R. Caves Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms , 1998 .

[3]  A. Scott,et al.  Metropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form , 1988 .

[4]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  F. Scherer,et al.  The economics of multi-plant operation : an international comparisons study , 1976 .

[6]  D. Rigby,et al.  Agglomeration and the Geography of Localization Economies in Canada , 2008 .

[7]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Global Links: Multinationals, Foreign Ownership and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing , 2005 .

[8]  Brent R. Moulton An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Unit , 1990 .

[9]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[10]  G. Stigler The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Industrial Organization and Location: Division of Labor, the Firm, and Spatial Process , 1986 .

[12]  Wulong Gu,et al.  Participation in Export Markets and Productivity Performance in Canadian Manufacturing , 2003 .

[13]  Boyan Jovanovic Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .

[14]  Ronald L. Moomaw,et al.  Spatial Productivity Variations in Manufacturing: A Critical Survey of Cross-Sectional Analyses , 1983 .

[15]  M. Storper The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[16]  Adam Smith,et al.  The wealth of nations : books I-III , 1997 .

[17]  S. Gerking Measuring Productivity Growth in U.S. Regions: A Survey , 1993 .

[18]  J. Henderson,et al.  Marshall's scale economies , 2001 .

[19]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[20]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[21]  Alan A. Carruth,et al.  What Do We Know about Investment under Uncertainty , 2000 .

[22]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Firm size and innovation , 1991 .

[23]  E. Monnikhof Sources of productivity growth - Mayes,DG , 1997 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[25]  S. Davies,et al.  Characterising Relative Performance: The Productivity Advantage of Foreign Owned Firms in the UK , 1991 .

[26]  E. Feser,et al.  Plant size and clustering of manufacturing activity , 2010 .

[27]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies , 2004 .

[28]  Marc J. Melitz The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity , 2003 .

[29]  D. Rigby,et al.  Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities , 2002 .

[30]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques , 2006 .

[31]  C. Pratten The competitiveness of small firms , 1991 .

[32]  J. Baldwin Productivity Growth, Plant Turnover and Restructuring in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector , 1995 .

[33]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[34]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[35]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[36]  Sophia P. Dimelis,et al.  Foreign ownership and production efficiency: a quantile regression analysis , 2002 .

[37]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Structural Change in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector (1970-90) , 1994 .

[38]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[39]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  The Determinants of Agglomeration , 2001 .

[40]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  The Review of Economics and Statistics , 2002 .

[41]  F. Scherer,et al.  The Economics of Multiplant Operation , 1977 .

[42]  A. Kleinknecht Firm size and innovation , 1989 .

[43]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  The Dynamics of Industrial Competition , 1995 .

[44]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[45]  Lin Bian,et al.  Failure Rates for New Canadian Firms: New Perspectives on Entry and Exit , 2000 .

[46]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The Nature and Importance of Economic Competence , 1994 .

[47]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants , 1992 .

[48]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[49]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[50]  Scott D. Schuh,et al.  Job Creation and Destruction , 1997 .

[51]  G. Duranton,et al.  Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and the Life-Cycle of Products , 2001 .