You may think that; I couldn't possibly comment! Modality studies : Contemporary research and future directions. Part II

Abstract This two-part article critically reviews eight recent works in the field of mood and modality. Part I explores three different theoretical approaches – generative, cognitive–pragmatic, and typological – with the main focus on languages other than English. Within the framework of generative grammar, research issues include: the epistemic-root interpretations of modal verbs; transitive–intransitive (dyadic–monadic) alternations; modal verb complementation, and the interaction of the modals with other systems, including negation, and alternate ways of encoding modality. The cognitive–pragmatic approach hones in on epistemic modality, and focuses on the cognitive mechanisms that become activated once speakers express evaluations of given states of affairs, involving various modal expression types. Reflecting mounting interest in grammatical typology as a whole, typological approaches to modality recognize this domain as a valid cross-language grammatical category, similar to tense and aspect, and establish a range of typological categories, which include propositional modality (epistemic and evidential) and event modality (deontic and dynamic). Part I also includes a descriptive account of the modal verb system in Danish. In Part II, the emphasis is on work in relation to (primarily) English, much of which is corpus-driven, and on non-verbal as well as verbal carriers of modal meanings. Thus, description and analysis move purposefully towards a more comprehensive account of the field, to embrace modal expressions such as modal lexical verbs, modal adverbs, and modal adjectives. The pragmatics of modality; the discursive functions of modal expressions, especially modal adverbs; and the treatment of modality in modern descriptive grammars of English are also covered. The article reflects mounting interest in recent years in modality studies. Whilst broadening the scope of modality studies to include treatment of non-verbal modal expressions is to be welcomed, comparatively little attention has so far been given to how different types of modal expression may combine in text to create modal synergy. Following a case study investigation into pragmatics and modality in Part II, the paper outlines an agenda for further research within a discourse and pragmatic perspective.

[1]  Wim van der Wurff,et al.  Modals, objects and negation in late Middle English , 2002 .

[2]  G. P. Henderson,et al.  An Essay in Modal Logic. , 1953 .

[3]  Jonny Butler,et al.  A minimalist treatment of modality , 2003 .

[4]  Sidney Greenbaum,et al.  Good English and the grammarian , 1988 .

[5]  Randolph Quirk,et al.  Grammatical and lexical variance in English , 1995 .

[6]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[7]  Eve Sweetser Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds , 1982 .

[8]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[9]  B. Heine Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization , 1993 .

[10]  Words and Worlds: On the linguistic analysis of modality , 1991 .

[11]  Sven Jacobson,et al.  Adverbial positions in English , 1968 .

[12]  G. Pullum,et al.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2002 .

[13]  Nicholas Smith Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English , 2003 .

[14]  J. Nuyts Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions , 2001 .

[15]  Andrea Faulstich Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface , 2004 .

[16]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[17]  System interaction in the coding of modality , 2002 .

[18]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other People's Minds , 2004 .

[19]  S. Barbiers Modality and Polarity , 2002 .

[20]  G. Leech Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. , 2003 .

[21]  J. Coates The semantics of the modal auxiliaries , 1983 .

[22]  J. van der Auwera,et al.  Modality’s semantic map , 1998 .

[23]  N. Fairclough Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[24]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[25]  F. Palmer Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues , 2003 .

[26]  Leo Hoye,et al.  Adverbs and Modality in English , 1997 .

[27]  Roberta Facchinetti,et al.  Modality in Contemporary English , 2003 .

[28]  T. Givón Evidentiality and Epistemic Space , 1982 .

[29]  G. Postma Negative polarity and modality in Middle Dutch ghe -particle constructions , 2002 .

[30]  Jenny A. Thomas Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics , 1995 .

[31]  Niels Davidsen-Nielsen Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish , 1990 .

[32]  Jef Verschueren,et al.  The pragmatic perspective , 1987 .

[33]  David Crystal,et al.  A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1997 .

[34]  Michael R. Perkins,et al.  Modal Expressions in English , 1983 .

[35]  Stéphane Gresset Towards a contextual micro-analysis of the non-equivalence of might and could , 2003 .

[36]  M. Halliday Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English , 1970 .

[37]  A. Cormack,et al.  Modals and negation in English , 2002 .

[38]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Embodied experience and linguistic meaning , 2003, Brain and Language.

[39]  Maurizio Gotti Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses , 2003 .

[40]  JANE H. Hill,et al.  Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse , 1994 .

[41]  J. Nuyts Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective , 2001 .

[42]  J. Searle Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[43]  Carita Paradis,et al.  Between epistemic modality and degree: the case of really , 2004 .

[44]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[45]  Jacob L. Mey,et al.  Pragmatics: An Introduction , 2001 .

[46]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[47]  E. Blom On the use and interpretation of root infinitives in early child Dutch , 2002 .

[48]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Studies in evidentiality , 2003 .

[49]  On the linguistic interpretation of contractual modalities , 1995 .

[50]  R. Beaugrande The ‘pragmatics’ of doing language science: The ‘warrant’ for large-corpus linguistics , 1996 .

[51]  A. Papafragou Modality and theory of mind: Perspectives from language development and autism , 2002 .

[52]  Marta Pirnat-Greenberg,et al.  A Comprehensive Grammar , 2002 .

[53]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[54]  Spencer-Oatey Hdm Cross-cultural politeness : British & Chinese conceptions of the tutor-student relationship. , 1992 .

[55]  Lars Hermerén,et al.  On modality in English: A study of the semantics of the modals , 1978 .

[56]  Toril Swan,et al.  Sentence adverbials in English : a synchronic and diachronic investigation , 1988 .

[57]  J. Mey,et al.  Linguistics and pragmatics, 25 years after , 2002 .

[58]  Milena Milojević Sheppard,et al.  Negative) Imperatives in Slovene , 2002 .

[59]  H. Grice Further Notes on Logic and Conversation , 1978 .

[60]  R. Huddleston Introduction to the Grammar of English: Verbs, nouns and adjectives: the boundaries between them , 1984 .

[61]  M. Krug Emerging English modals : a corpus-based study of grammaticalization , 2000 .

[62]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Modality in grammar and discourse , 1995 .

[63]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[64]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Current Issues in Modality: An introduction to modality and its interaction with the verbal system , 2002 .

[65]  Joybrato Mukherjee Principles of Pattern Selection , 2001 .

[66]  F. Palmer Modality and the English modals , 1979 .

[67]  Jan Nuyts,et al.  Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language , 1991 .

[68]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Minimization and conversational inference , 1987 .

[69]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[70]  Gregory Ward,et al.  A pragmatic analysis of the epistemic would construction in english , 2003 .

[71]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[72]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean , 1977 .

[73]  Patricia V. Lunn The Evaluative Function of the Spanish Subjunctive , 1995 .

[74]  Elly Ifantidou,et al.  Evidentials and relevance , 2001 .

[75]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Irrealis as a grammatical category , 1998 .

[76]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .