Central inhibitory action attributable to presynaptic depolarization produced by muscle afferent volleys

Frank & Fuortes (1957) and Frank (1959 and personal communication) have shown that muscle afferent volleys produce inhibition by diminishing the size of the monosynaptic excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) of motoneurones without having any other demonstrable action on those motoneurones. Thus there was no change in the ionic permeability of the post-synaptic membrane, such as occurs with other types of inhibition (Coombs, Eccles & Fatt, 1955a), for there was no associated membrane potential change either at the normal resting potential, or when the membrane potential was altered by a background depolarizing or hyperpolarizing current. Furthermore, there was no associated change in motoneuronal excitability as tested either by the intracellular application of current pulses or by the response to invasion by an antidromic impulse in the motor axon. Evidently it should be concluded that the diminution of the EPSPs is due to a diminished excitatory action of the Group Ia presynaptic impulses. However, Frank (1959) in addition proposed an alternative explanation, which attributed the EPSP depression to an action exerted so far out on the dendrites of the motoneurone that no trace of the inhibitory influence itself could be detected by a micro-electrode in the motoneuronal soma. Since both these alternative explanations would locate inhibitory action at a site remote from the motoneurone soma, Frank (1959) employed the term 'remote inhibition' for the phenomenon. It is proposed here to use the non-committal term 'EPSP depression' instead, until a more appropriate term can be developed later in this paper. There are many suggestions in the literature that central inhibitory action occurs in the presynaptic pathway, there being block or depression of presynaptic excitatory impulses (Barron & Matthews, 1935, 1938; Renshaw, 1946; Brooks, Eccles & Malcolm, 1948; Howland, Lettvin, McCulioch, Pitts & Wall, 1955). These various suggestions will be examined

[1]  D. H. Barron,et al.  Intermittent conduction in the spinal cord , 1935, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. H. Barron,et al.  The interpretation of potential changes in the spinal cord , 1938, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  B. Renshaw Observations on interaction of nerve impulses in the gray matter and on the nature of central inhibition. , 1946, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic potentials of inhibited motoneurones. , 1948, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. P. Lloyd POST-TETANIC POTENTIATION OF RESPONSE IN MONOSYNAPTIC REFLEX PATHWAYS OF THE SPINAL CORD , 1949, The Journal of general physiology.

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  Effects induced in a monosynaptic reflex path by its activation. , 1951, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Analysis of the fast afferent impulses from thigh muscles , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  B. Katz,et al.  Changes in end‐plate activity produced by pre‐synaptic polarization , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Eccles,et al.  The inhibitory suppression of reflex discharges from motoneurones , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  W S McCULLOCH,et al.  Reflex inhibition by dorsal root interaction. , 1955, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Eccles,et al.  The specific ionic conductances and the ionic movements across the motoneuronal membrane that produce the inhibitory post‐synaptic potential , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  A. W. Liley,et al.  The effects of presynaptic polarization on the spontaneous activity at the mammalian neuromuscular junction , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  K. Frank Presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes , 1957 .

[14]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic actions on motoneurones in relation to the two components of the group i muscle afferent volley , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic actions on motoneurones caused by impulses in Golgi tendon organ afferents , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  S. Hagiwara,et al.  A study on the mechanism of impulse transmission across the giant synapse of the squid , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. Eccles,et al.  The time courses of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic actions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  R. Miledi,et al.  Delayed effects of peripheral severance of afferent nerve fibres on the efficacy of their central synapses , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Eccles,et al.  Presynaptic changes associated with post‐tetanic potentiation in the spinal cord , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Eccles,et al.  Monosynaptic excitatory action on motoneurones regenerated to antagonistic muscles , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic action during and after repetitive stimulation , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  J. Eccles,et al.  Dorsal root reflexes of muscle Group I afferent fibres , 1961, The Journal of physiology.