Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication

Significance Patterns of distributed brain activity are thought to underlie virtually all aspects of cognition and behavior. In this paper, we explore the degree to which it is possible to predict such functional patterns from the network of anatomical connections that link brain regions. To this end, we use three separately acquired neuroimaging datasets recording anatomical and functional connections in the human brain. We apply several measures of network communication that are derived analytically from the brain’s anatomical network. Our principal finding is that such network measures can predict empirically measured functional connectivity at levels that exceed other modeling approaches. Our study sheds light on the important role of anatomical networks and communication processes in shaping the brain’s functional activity. The complex relationship between structural and functional connectivity, as measured by noninvasive imaging of the human brain, poses many unresolved challenges and open questions. Here, we apply analytic measures of network communication to the structural connectivity of the human brain and explore the capacity of these measures to predict resting-state functional connectivity across three independently acquired datasets. We focus on the layout of shortest paths across the network and on two communication measures—search information and path transitivity—which account for how these paths are embedded in the rest of the network. Search information is an existing measure of information needed to access or trace shortest paths; we introduce path transitivity to measure the density of local detours along the shortest path. We find that both search information and path transitivity predict the strength of functional connectivity among both connected and unconnected node pairs. They do so at levels that match or significantly exceed path length measures, Euclidean distance, as well as computational models of neural dynamics. This capacity suggests that dynamic couplings due to interactions among neural elements in brain networks are substantially influenced by the broader network context adjacent to the shortest communication pathways.

[1]  M P Young,et al.  Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Network Information Theory , 2001 .

[3]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[4]  Heiko Rieger,et al.  Random walks on complex networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[5]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Searchability of networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Copenhagen,et al.  Hide-and-seek on complex networks , 2005 .

[8]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K Sneppen,et al.  Communication boundaries in networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[15]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[16]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Loss of Resting Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity after Complete Section of the Corpus Callosum , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Kahn,et al.  Functionally linked resting‐state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[22]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[24]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Joaqu'in Goni,et al.  Topological reversibility and causality in feed-forward networks , 2010, 1007.1829.

[26]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[30]  O. Sporns,et al.  Functional connectivity between anatomically unconnected areas is shaped by collective network-level effects in the macaque cortex. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[32]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Simple models of human brain functional networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  O. Sporns,et al.  High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Gore,et al.  The Relationship of Anatomical and Functional Connectivity to Resting-State Connectivity in Primate Somatosensory Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[35]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Exploring the Morphospace of Communication Efficiency in Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  J. Rapoport,et al.  The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Spreading dynamics on spatially constrained complex brain networks , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.