Evaluating Transfer Programmes within a General Equilibrium Framework

We develop a general equilibrium model for evaluating domestically financed transfer programmes and derive analytical expressions which provide a framework for combining results from a computable general equilibrium model with disaggregated household data. We separate the welfare impact into three components, i.e. "redistribution", "reallocative", and "distortionary" effects. We show how these are subsumed within one parameter, the "cost of public funds". Using a Mexican programme for illustration, we show that substantial welfare gains result from a switch from universal food subsidies to targeted transfers, reflecting both the improved targeting efficiency of the latter and the relaxation the trade-off between equity and efficiency when designing tax systems. Copyright 2004 Royal Economic Society.

[1]  I. Little,et al.  Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries , 1974 .

[2]  Charles L. Ballard,et al.  General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States , 1985 .

[3]  M. Feldstein,et al.  Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices , 1972 .

[4]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Progressing Through Progresa: An Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment , 2001 .

[5]  D. Coady,et al.  On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Alternative Transfer Instruments , 2004 .

[6]  Charles L. Ballard.  The Marginal Efficiency Cost of Redistribution , 1988 .

[7]  A. Snow,et al.  The Marginal Cost of Raising Tax Revenue and Redistributing Income , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  S. Handa,et al.  Poverty, inequality, and spillover in Mexico's education, health, and nutrition program , 2001 .

[9]  A Complete Set of Shadow Prices for Pakistan:Illustrations for 1975-76 , 1988 .

[10]  B. Agarwal.  ''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household , 1997 .

[11]  C. Reynolds.  The Mexican Economy , 1975 .

[12]  D. Newbery.  The theory of taxation for developing countries , 1988 .

[13]  Sherman Robinson,et al.  Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods , 2001 .

[14]  S. Robinson,et al.  A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS , 2002 .

[15]  F. Bourguignon.  On the Measurement of Inequality , 2003 .

[16]  R. Harris.  Estimation of a regionalized Mexican Social Accounting Matrix , 2002 .

[17]  D. Coady,et al.  Commodity Taxation and Social Welfare: The Generalized Ramsey Rule , 2000 .

[18]  N. Stern,et al.  The theory of cost-benefit analysis , 1987 .

[19]  D. Coady.  Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developing Countries: An Application to Pakistan , 1997 .

[20]  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON CONSUMPTION : A FINAL REPORT , 2000 .

[21]  T. Paul,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS , 2000 .

[22]  R. Adams.  Livestock income, male/female animals, and inequality in rural Pakistan , 1996 .

[23]  P. Gertler.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON HEALTH; FINAL REPORT , 2000 .

[24]  P. Schultz.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS; FINAL REPORT , 2000 .