Propagation of the measurement uncertainty in Fourier transform digital holographic interferometry

Abstract. The derivation of expressions to evaluate the local standard uncertainty of the complex amplitude of the numerically reconstructed field as well as of the phase-change measurements resulting from Fourier- and quasi-Fourier transform digital holographic interferometry is presented. Applying the law of propagation of uncertainty, as defined in the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement,” to the digital reconstruction of holograms by Fourier transformation and to the subsequent calculation of the phase change between two such reconstructions results in a set of expressions, which allow the evaluation of the uncertainties of the complex amplitude and of the phase change at every pixel of the reconstruction in terms of the measured values and their standard uncertainty in the pixels of the original digital holograms. These expressions are increasingly simplified by first assuming a linear dependence between the squared uncertainty and the local value of the original holograms, and then considering that the object beam is a speckle pattern. We assess the behavior of the method by comparing the predicted standard uncertainty with the sample variance obtained from experiments conducted under repeatability conditions, and find a good agreement between both quantities.

[1]  Bryan M. Hennelly,et al.  Effect of additive noise on phase measurement in digital holographic microscopy , 2011 .

[2]  Chapter 8 – ANALYSIS OF PLANE HOLOGRAMS , 1971 .

[3]  B D Hall,et al.  On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities , 2004 .

[4]  Etienne Cuche,et al.  Shot-noise influence on the reconstructed phase image signal-to-noise ratio in digital holographic microscopy. , 2006, Applied optics.

[5]  W. R. Brohinsky,et al.  Electrooptic holography and its application to hologram interferometry. , 1985, Applied optics.

[6]  Nitesh Pandey,et al.  Quantization noise and its reduction in lensless Fourier digital holography. , 2011, Applied optics.

[7]  C. Liguori,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in a discrete Fourier transform algorithm , 2000 .

[8]  Ángel F. Doval,et al.  Hybrid optonumerical quasi Fourier transform digital holographic camera , 2006, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[9]  Christian Depeursinge,et al.  Influence of shot noise on phase measurement accuracy in digital holographic microscopy. , 2007, Optics express.

[10]  J. Janesick,et al.  Charge-Coupled-Device Charge-Collection Efficiency And The Photon-Transfer Technique , 1987 .

[11]  Ángel F. Doval,et al.  Evaluation of the uncertainty of phase-difference measurements in (quasi-)Fourier transform digital holographic interferometry , 2015, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[12]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Algorithm for directly retrieving the phase difference: a generalization , 2003 .