On the presence and role of human gene-body DNA methylation

DNA methylation of promoter sequences is a repressive epigenetic mark that down-regulates gene expression. However, DNA methylation is more prevalent within gene-bodies than seen for promoters, and gene-body methylation has been observed to be positively correlated with gene expression levels. This paradox remains unexplained, and accordingly the role of DNA methylation in gene-bodies is poorly understood. We addressed the presence and role of human gene-body DNA methylation using a meta-analysis of human genome-wide methylation, expression and chromatin data sets. Methylation is associated with transcribed regions as genic sequences have higher levels of methylation than intergenic or promoter sequences. We also find that the relationship between gene-body DNA methylation and expression levels is non-monotonic and bell-shaped. Mid-level expressed genes have the highest levels of gene-body methylation, whereas the most lowly and highly expressed sets of genes both have low levels of methylation. While gene-body methylation can be seen to efficiently repress the initiation of intragenic transcription, the vast majority of methylated sites within genes are not associated with intragenic promoters. In fact, highly expressed genes initiate the most intragenic transcription, which is inconsistent with the previously held notion that gene-body methylation serves to repress spurious intragenic transcription to allow for efficient transcriptional elongation. These observations lead us to propose a model to explain the presence of human gene-body methylation. This model holds that the repression of intragenic transcription by gene-body methylation is largely epiphenomenal, and suggests that gene-body methylation levels are predominantly shaped via the accessibility of the DNA to methylating enzyme complexes.

[1]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) , 2011, PLoS biology.

[2]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences , 2009, Nature.

[3]  P. Avner,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation in mammals. , 1997, Annual review of genetics.

[4]  A. Riggs,et al.  A human B cell methylome at 100−base pair resolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Gnirke,et al.  Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Mary Goldman,et al.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011 , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[8]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation , 2010, Science.

[9]  Jun Kawai,et al.  Genome-wide detection and analysis of hippocampus core promoters using DeepCAGE. , 2009, Genome research.

[10]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Allen D. Delaney,et al.  Conserved Role of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Regulating Alternative Promoters , 2010, Nature.

[12]  David Haussler,et al.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010 , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  S. Batzoglou,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding Sites Based on ChIP-Seq Data , 2008, Nature Methods.

[14]  A. Chess,et al.  Gene Body-Specific Methylation on the Active X Chromosome , 2007, Science.

[15]  D. Aran,et al.  Replication timing-related and gene body-specific methylation of active human genes. , 2011, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  C. Kai,et al.  CAGE: cap analysis of gene expression , 2006, Nature Methods.

[17]  P. Jones,et al.  The DNA methylation paradox. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[18]  A. Greenleaf,et al.  Hyperphosphorylated C-terminal Repeat Domain-associating Proteins in the Nuclear Proteome Link Transcription to DNA/Chromatin Modification and RNA Processing* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  Madeleine P. Ball,et al.  Corrigendum: Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  S. Klimašauskas,et al.  Processive Methylation of Hemimethylated CpG Sites by Mouse Dnmt1 DNA Methyltransferase* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Jan Bressler,et al.  Epigenetics and human disease. , 2004, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[22]  A. Mortazavi,et al.  Genome-Wide Mapping of in Vivo Protein-DNA Interactions , 2007, Science.

[23]  I. Henderson,et al.  Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Stanley Fields.  Molecular biology. Site-seeing by sequencing. , 2007, Science.

[25]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[26]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Soojin V. Yi,et al.  DNA Methylation and Genome Evolution in Honeybee: Gene Length, Expression, Functional Enrichment Covary with the Evolutionary Signature of DNA Methylation , 2010, Genome biology and evolution.

[28]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[29]  Piero Carninci,et al.  High-efficiency full-length cDNA cloning by biotinylated CAP trapper. , 1996, Genomics.

[30]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Tyson A. Clark,et al.  Alternative splicing and differential gene expression in colon cancer detected by a whole genome exon array , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[32]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting , 1993, Nature.

[33]  S Tweedie,et al.  Studies of DNA methylation in animals , 1995, Journal of Cell Science.

[34]  K. Robertson.  DNA methylation and human disease , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  D. Brutlag,et al.  A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Bird,et al.  Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  Stanley Fields,et al.  Site-Seeing by Sequencing , 2007, Science.

[38]  C. Walsh,et al.  Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Adrian Bird,et al.  CpG methylation is targeted to transcription units in an invertebrate genome. , 2007, Genome research.

[40]  Madeleine P. Ball,et al.  Targeted and genome-scale methylomics reveals gene body signatures in human cell lines , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Kayla E. Smith,et al.  The ENCODE Project at UC Santa Cruz , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Jianrong Wang,et al.  A Gibbs sampling strategy applied to the mapping of ambiguous short-sequence tags , 2010, Bioinform..

[43]  Terrence S. Furey,et al.  The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  A. Feinberg,et al.  The history of cancer epigenetics , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[45]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  Twists and turns of DNA methylation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Chia-Lin Wei,et al.  Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. , 2010, Genome research.