Watermark capacity measure incorporating a model of the human visual system

The problem of evaluating the maximum number of information bits that can be hidden within an image is considered; usually it is addressed by looking at the watermarking process as a communication task, in which the signal, i.e. the watermark, is transmitted over the channel, the host data acts the part of. Thus the maximum number of information bits is the capacity of the watermark-channel. By relying on experimental results in which the dependence of the watermark capacity upon the watermark strength G is evidenced, the knowledge of the maximum allowed watermark level, under the constraint of watermark invisibility, is required. G is often interactively adjusted to the image at hand, because no simple algorithm exists that permits to fit the watermark level according to the characteristics of the host image. Hence, a novel algorithm to model the Human Visual System has been developed which considers frequency sensitivity, local luminance and contrast masking effects. The proposed method exploits a block based DCT decomposition of the image, that permits to trade off between spatial and frequency localisation of the image features and disturbs. Through this model, the maximum allowable watermark strength is determined in a completely automatic mode and then the value of watermark capacity is computed.

[1]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Low bit rate near-transparent image coding , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[2]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Review of watermarking and the importance of perceptual modeling , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Object detection in a noisy scene , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  Edward J. Delp,et al.  Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Signal compression based on models of human perception , 1993, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Image Quality with the Square Root Integral Method , 1990, Applied Vision.

[9]  Mauro Barni,et al.  A DCT-domain system for robust image watermarking , 1998, Signal Process..

[10]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Ahmed H. Te Data Hiding for Multimedia Personalization, Interaction, and Protection , 1997 .

[14]  Thomas R. Fischer,et al.  Comparison of generalized Gaussian and Laplacian modeling in DCT image coding , 1995, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[15]  Mauro Barni,et al.  Capacity of full frame DCT image watermarks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Human visual quality criterion , 1990, Other Conferences.

[17]  R. Gallager Information Theory and Reliable Communication , 1968 .

[18]  Mauro Barni,et al.  Capacity of the watermark channel: how many bits can be hidden within a digital image? , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression , 1998, Signal Process..