Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.

We report the computer generation of a high-density map of the thermodynamic properties of the diffusion-accessible encounter conformations of four receptor-ligand protein pairs, and use it to study the electrostatic and desolvation components of the free energy of association. Encounter complex conformations are generated by sampling the translational/rotational space of the ligand around the receptor, both at 5-A and zero surface-to-surface separations. We find that partial desolvation is always an important effect, and it becomes dominant for complexes in which one of the reactants is neutral or weakly charged. The interaction provides a slowly varying attractive force over a small but significant region of the molecular surface. In complexes with no strong charge complementarity this region surrounds the binding site, and the orientation of the ligand in the encounter conformation with the lowest desolvation free energy is similar to the one observed in the fully formed complex. Complexes with strong opposite charges exhibit two types of behavior. In the first group, represented by barnase/barstar, electrostatics exerts strong orientational steering toward the binding site, and desolvation provides some added adhesion within the local region of low electrostatic energy. In the second group, represented by the complex of kallikrein and pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, the overall stability results from the rather nonspecific electrostatic attraction, whereas the affinity toward the binding region is determined by desolvation interactions.

[1]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Protein docking and complementarity. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Fredy Sussman,et al.  Solvent accessibility as a predictive tool for the free energy of inhibitor binding to the HIV‐1 protease , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  S Vajda,et al.  Empirical free energy calculation: Comparison to calorimetric data , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[5]  J. Janin,et al.  Elusive affinities , 1995, Proteins.

[6]  Schellman Ja The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. , 1955 .

[7]  M Levitt,et al.  Water: now you see it, now you don't. , 1993, Structure.

[8]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  J. Schellman The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. , 1955, Comptes rendus des travaux du Laboratoire Carlsberg. Serie chimique.

[10]  K. Dill Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[11]  H. Erickson,et al.  Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Bersohn,et al.  Production and subsequent second-order decomposition of protein disulfide anions lengthy collisions between proteins. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[14]  R C Wade,et al.  Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[15]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding in model proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Rebecca C. Wade,et al.  Effective Charges for Macromolecules in Solvent , 1996 .

[17]  J L Cornette,et al.  Consistency in structural energetics of protein folding and peptide recognition , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  J. Janin The kinetics of protein‐protein recognition , 1997, Proteins.

[19]  Håkan Wennerström,et al.  Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions , 1996, Nature.

[20]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Facilitated Target Location in Biological Systems* , 2022 .

[21]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  C. DeLisi,et al.  The biophysics of ligand–receptor interactions , 1980, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[23]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  On the specificity of DNA-protein interactions. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B Honig,et al.  Computer simulations of the diffusion of a substrate to an active site of an enzyme. , 1987, Science.

[25]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Theoretical determination of sterically allowed conformations of a polypeptide chain by a computer method , 1965 .

[26]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Richard M. Noyes,et al.  Effects of diffusion rates on chemical kinetics , 1961 .

[28]  G. Otting,et al.  Studies of protein hydration in aqueous solution by direct NMR observation of individual protein-bound water molecules , 1989 .

[29]  S Vajda,et al.  Flexible docking and design. , 1995, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[30]  J. Hofsteenge,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the contribution of ionic interactions to the formation of the thrombin-hirudin complex. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[31]  Camacho Entropic Barriers, Frustration, and Order: Basic Ingredients in Protein Folding. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[32]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[33]  B. Tidor,et al.  Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[34]  P. Andrew Karplus,et al.  Ordered water in macromolecular structure , 1994 .

[35]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Brownian dynamics simulation of diffusion‐influenced bimolecular reactions , 1984 .

[36]  M J Sternberg,et al.  A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[38]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.

[40]  G. Moore,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in colicin E9 DNase-immunity protein complexes. 1. Diffusion-controlled association and femtomolar binding for the cognate complex. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[41]  M. Lewis,et al.  Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[42]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[43]  S Vajda,et al.  Effect of conformational flexibility and solvation on receptor-ligand binding free energies. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[44]  Robert E. Bruccoleri,et al.  Finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatic calculations: Increased accuracy achieved by harmonic dielectric smoothing and charge antialiasing , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.