Determinants of export behavior in the Greek manufacturing sector

This paper examines the determinants of export performance of firms in the Greek manufacturing industry, using cross-sectional data from 1652 firms in 1999 and a Tobit regression model. The study finds that firms that have larger size, lower unit labor cost and low capital to labor ratio have a higher propensity to export, confirming the fact that in Greece, which has the second lowest capital to labor ratio among the EU-15 members, export activities are concentrated among firms with low capital intensity, exactly as the theory of competitive advantage would predict.

[1]  Alphonso O. Ogbuehi,et al.  Perceptions of U.S. Manufacturing SMEs concerning Exporting: A Comparison Based on Export Experience , 1994 .

[2]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  A Test of the Factor Endowments Model of Trade in a Rapidly Industrializing Country: The Case of Korea , 1993 .

[3]  Karin Wagner,et al.  Innovation and the Skill Mix: Chemicals and Engineering in Britain and Germany , 1994, National Institute Economic Review.

[4]  S. Roper,et al.  Local Learning from Multinational Plants: Knowledge Transfers in the Supply Chain , 2001 .

[5]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  The impact of technical characteristics on export activity: a study of small and medium‐sized UK electronics firms , 1982 .

[6]  Sukkyun Chung,et al.  Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea , 1999 .

[7]  J Wagner,et al.  Exports, firm size, and firm dynamics , 1995 .

[8]  David E. Weinstein,et al.  Using International and Japanese Regional Data to Determine When the Factor Abundance Theory of Trade Works , 1997 .

[9]  Guido Nassimbeni,et al.  Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: a logit/tobit model , 2001 .

[10]  Tim Ambler,et al.  Successful Export Practice , 1994 .

[11]  Antoine A Auquier,et al.  Sizes of Firms, Exporting Behavior, and the Structure of French Industry , 1980 .

[12]  V. Gimede,et al.  Export Propensities and Intensities of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in South Africa , 2004 .

[13]  H. Glejser,et al.  Exports in an Imperfect Competition Framework: An Analysis of 1,446 Exporters , 1980 .

[14]  Roberto Basile,et al.  Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation , 2001 .

[15]  Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Technology, firm size and export behaviour in developing countries: The case of Indian enterprises , 1994 .

[16]  P. Vermeulen,et al.  Factor content, size, and export propensity at the firm level , 2004 .

[17]  C. Greenhalgh,et al.  Innovation and Export Volumes and Prices--A Disaggregated Study , 1994 .

[18]  B Anderton,et al.  Innovation, product quality, variety, and trade performance: an empirical analysis of Germany and the UK , 1999 .

[19]  Paul M. Swiercz,et al.  Firm Size and Export Behavior: Lessons from the Midwest , 1991 .

[20]  Kazuhide Okada,et al.  Japanese Industrialization and Its Social Consequences , 1976 .

[21]  J Wagner,et al.  A Note on the Firm Size – Export Relationship , 2001 .

[22]  Katharine Wakelin,et al.  Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level , 1998 .

[23]  Michael L. Ursic,et al.  An experience curve explanation of export expansion , 1984 .

[24]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants , 2002 .

[25]  Melina Dritsaki,et al.  A Causal Relationship between Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth for Greece , 2004 .

[26]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[27]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  A test of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek theorem: The Leontief commonplace , 1985 .

[28]  B. Aw,et al.  Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market : Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea , 1998 .

[29]  Sukkyun Chung,et al.  Productivity and the Decision to Export: Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea , 1998 .

[30]  Larry Willmore,et al.  Tansnationals and foreign trade: Evidence from Brazil , 1992 .

[31]  Paul Westhead,et al.  Exporting and non‐exporting small firms in Great Britain , 1995 .

[32]  Bob Anderton.  UK Trade Performance and the Role of Product Quality, Innovation and Hysteresis: Some Preliminary Results , 1999 .

[33]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance , 1999 .

[34]  Seev Hirsch,et al.  R&D intensity and export performance: A micro view , 1985 .

[35]  Sanghamitra Das,et al.  Micro Foundations of Export Dynamics , 2000 .

[36]  Richard E. Caves.  Exporting Behavior and Market Structure: Evidence from the United States , 1986 .

[37]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Trade and Technology from a Schumpeterian Perspective , 1997 .

[38]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Aggregation Bias in the Factor Content of Trade: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing , 2000 .