Analysis of high-frequency Pg/Lg ratios from NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes

The high-frequency Pg/Lg discriminant is studied between frequencies of 0.5 and 10 Hz using 294 NTS explosions and 114 western U.S. earthquakes recorded at four broadband seismic stations operated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The stations are located at distances of about 200 to 400 km from the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Event magnitudes ranged from about 2.5 to 6.5, and propagation paths for the earthquakes range from approximately 175 to 1300 km. The discriminant is shown to be very effective and displays improved separation between earthquakes and explosions as frequency is increased. Because of propagation effects, it is important to apply distance corrections directly to the amplitude ratios or to the magnitude-corrected amplitudes prior to computing the ratios. Multivariate discrimination analysis using both maximum-likelihood Gaussian classifiers and a backpropagation neural network show that approximately 95% of the events can be correctly identified. Both classification procedures were designed to handle missing data filled in using a nearest-neighbor algorithm. Except for a few notable exceptions, most of the earthquake misclassifications occur for mb < 4, which is expected for events having reduced signal-to-noise ratios. All of the explosion misclassifications occur for mb < 4, suggesting a source or near-source effect rather than an effect of poor signal-to-noise ratio. The explosions that were misclassified were typically of magnitude large enough to be classified correctly by mb/Ms or Love-wave energy. The main drawback of the Pg/Lg discriminant is that, because of signal-to-noise considerations and propagation effects, the number of measurements are reduced considerably at higher frequencies. It is expected that the problem will be amplified as magnitudes are reduced and event-receiver distances are increased.

[1]  S. P. Jarpe Guide for using data from the LNN seismic monitoring network , 1989 .

[2]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[3]  Eileen S. Vergino,et al.  Yield estimation using regional mb(Pn) , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Spectral discrimination between NTS explosions and Western United States earthquakes at regional distances , 1988 .

[5]  Fisk,et al.  Applications of generalized likelihood ratio tests to seismic event identification. Final report, 25 May 1990-25 August 1993 , 1993 .

[6]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  An analysis of spectral differences between Nevada Test Site and Shagan River nuclear explosions , 1991 .

[7]  Eric P. Chael,et al.  Spectral discrimination of NTS explosions and earthquakes in the southwestern United States using high‐frequency regional data , 1988 .

[8]  S. R. Taylor,et al.  Analysis of Lg spectral ratios from NTS explosions: Implications for the source mechanisms of spall and the generation of Lg waves , 1995 .

[9]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[10]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Regional discrimination between NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes , 1989 .

[11]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[13]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Regional seismic waveform discriminants and case-based event identification using regional arrays , 1990 .

[14]  Paul W. Pomeroy,et al.  Test ban treaty verification with regional data—A review , 1982 .

[15]  Jay J. Pulli,et al.  Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and the use of trained neural networks , 1990 .

[16]  H. Hartley Maximum Likelihood Estimation from Incomplete Data , 1958 .

[17]  R. C. Lilwall Regional mb:Ms, Lg/Pg amplitude ratios and Lg spectral ratios as criteria for distinguishing between earthquakes and explosions: a theoretical study , 1988 .

[18]  D. Signorini,et al.  Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[19]  S. R. Taylor,et al.  Attenuation and scattering of broadband P and S waves across North America , 1986 .

[20]  David J. Hand,et al.  Discrimination and Classification , 1982 .

[21]  R. A. Wagner,et al.  A comparison of regional phases from underground nuclear explosions at east Kazakh and Nevada test sites , 1992 .

[22]  W. Chan,et al.  Spectral Discrimination between Explosions and Earthquakes in Central Eurasia , 1990 .

[23]  S. R. Taylor,et al.  Investigation of mb and MS formulas for the Western United States and their impact on the MS/mb discriminant , 1987 .

[24]  Farid U. Dowla,et al.  Seismic discrimination with artificial neural networks: Preliminary results with regional spectral data , 1990 .

[25]  William R. Walter,et al.  Phase and spectral ratio discrimination between NTS earthquakes and explosions. Part I: Empirical observations , 1995 .

[26]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.