Computed Tomographic Angiography–Based Planning of Bipedicled DIEP Flaps with Intraflap Crossover Anastomosis: An Anatomical and Clinical Study

Background: When using deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps in breast reconstruction, harvesting bipedicled flaps can be a valuable option in cases requiring the transfer of a large portion of harvested flaps. Connecting the bilateral deep inferior epigastric arteries (DIEAs) by intraflap crossover anastomosis is one of the most popular methods of constructing bipedicled DIEP flaps. Planning the primary and secondary pedicle configurations for reliable intraflap crossover anastomosis is crucial. To achieve this, detailed anatomical DIEA information might be helpful. However, meticulous planning of bipedicled DIEP flaps based on computed tomographic angiography has not been reported. Methods: Detailed anatomical investigation of DIEA branches was conducted using computed tomographic angiographs of 100 hemiabdomens. Thirty-eight prospectively collected patients who underwent breast reconstruction using bipedicled DIEP flaps with intraflap crossover under computed tomographic angiography–based planning were reviewed. Results: Three intramuscular DIEA branching patterns with distinct branch point topography, branch diameters, and superior continuations cranial to sizable perforators were observed. In the prospective clinical study, a primary pedicle with a recipient branch for intraflap crossover anastomosis could be specified preoperatively using computed tomographic angiography–based anatomical data of the pedicles, including size of DIEA branches or their superior continuation and size of perforators. In all cases, the bipedicle configuration was easily achieved as planned on computed tomographic angiography, and secure perfusion of the entire flap was achieved. Conclusions: The authors’ results suggest that computed tomographic angiography provides detailed anatomical DIEA information, and comprehensive analysis of these data allows precise planning of bipedicle configurations with intraflap crossover anastomosis in DIEP flaps. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

[1]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Bipedicle-conjoined perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. , 2015, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  A. Cina,et al.  The Retrograde Limb of Internal Mammary Vessels as Reliable Recipient Vessels in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical and Radiological Study , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  J. Wasiak,et al.  Stacked Abdominal Flap for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[4]  M. Cheng,et al.  A Strategic Approach for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients With a Vertical Midline Abdominal Scar , 2014, Annals of plastic surgery.

[5]  K. Oh,et al.  Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiography of Both Donor and Recipient Sites for Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  M. Hanasono,et al.  Comparison of flow rates in the antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vein for free flap breast reconstruction , 2011, Microsurgery.

[7]  C. Trahan,et al.  Stacked Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Review of 110 Flaps in 55 Cases over 3 Years , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The Single Dominant Medial Row Perforator DIEP Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Three-Dimensional Perforasome and Clinical Results , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  M. Schaverien,et al.  Relationship between Venous Congestion and Intraflap Venous Anatomy in DIEP Flaps Using Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  W. Rozen,et al.  The branching pattern of the deep inferior epigastric artery revisited in‐vivo: A new classification based on CT angiography , 2009, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  N. Somia,et al.  A new approach to preexisting vertical midline abdominal scars with crossover DIEP flap breast reconstruction , 2010, Microsurgery.

[12]  Hua Xu,et al.  Bipedicle Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: Seven Years’ Experience , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  W. Rozen,et al.  Avoiding Denervation of Rectus Abdominis in DIEP Flap Harvest: The Importance of Medial Row Perforators , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  G. I. Taylor,et al.  The DIEA Branching Pattern and Its Relationship to Perforators: The Importance of Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiography for DIEA Perforator Flaps , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  N. Roche,et al.  Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[16]  G. Huemer,et al.  Management of infraumbilical vertical scars in DIEP-flaps by crossover anastomosis. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[17]  G. I. Taylor,et al.  The Vascular Anatomy of Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flaps Based on the Deep Superior Epigastric System , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.