Habitat microclimates drive fine‐scale variation in extreme temperatures

Most multicellular terrestrial organisms experience climate at scales of millimetres to metres, yet most species-climate associations are analysed at resolutions of kilometres or more. Because individuals experience heterogeneous microclimates in the landscape, species sometimes survive where the average background climate appears unsuitable, and equally may be eliminated from sites within apparently suitable grid cells where microclimatic extremes are intolerable. Local vegetation structure and topography can be important determinants of fine-resolution microclimate, but a literature search revealed that the vast majority of bioclimate studies do not include fine-scale habitat information, let alone a representation of how habitat affects microclimate. In this paper, we show that habitat type (grassland, heathland, deciduous woodland) is a major modifier of the temperature extremes experienced by organisms. We recorded differences among these habitats of more than 5°C in monthly temperature maxima and minima, and of 10°C in thermal range, on a par with the level of warming expected for extreme future climate change scenarios. Comparable differences were found in relation to variation in local topography (slope and aspect). Hence, we argue that the microclimatic effects of habitat and topography must be included in studies if we are to obtain sufficiently detailed projections of the ecological impacts of climate change to develop detailed adaptation strategies for the conservation of biodiversity.

[1]  T. Brereton,et al.  Changes in habitat specificity of species at their climatic range boundaries. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[2]  D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Effects of temperature and elevation on habitat use by a rare mountain butterfly: implications for species responses to climate change , 2009 .

[3]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Phenology Feedbacks on Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[4]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[5]  Biing T. Guan,et al.  Modeling monthly mean temperatures for the mountain regions of Taiwan by generalized additive models , 2009 .

[6]  J. O’Hanley,et al.  Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones , 2008 .

[7]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  Habitat shifts of endangered species under altered climate conditions: importance of biotic interactions , 2008 .

[8]  M. Hill,et al.  Slope, aspect and climate: Spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland , 2008 .

[9]  J. Newman,et al.  Will climate change be beneficial or detrimental to the invasive swede midge in North America? Contrasting predictions using climate projections from different general circulation models , 2008 .

[10]  H P Possingham,et al.  Assisted Colonization and Rapid Climate Change , 2008, Science.

[11]  Flemming Skov,et al.  Postglacial dispersal limitation of widespread forest plant species in nemoral Europe , 2008 .

[12]  M. Luoto,et al.  Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models , 2008 .

[13]  A. Pitman,et al.  Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions , 2007 .

[14]  R. Cowling,et al.  Predicting patterns of plant species richness in megadiverse South Africa , 2006 .

[15]  D. White,et al.  Predicting climate‐induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability , 2006 .

[16]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[17]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes , 2006 .

[18]  Greg Hughes,et al.  Vulnerability of African mammals to anthropogenic climate change under conservative land transformation assumptions , 2006 .

[19]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[20]  Michael D. Mastrandrea,et al.  Human-modified temperatures induce species changes: Joint attribution , 2005 .

[21]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Resources, habitats and metapopulations - Whither reality? , 2004 .

[22]  B. Chomel,et al.  Modeling the distribution and abundance of the non-native parasite, canine heartworm, in California coyotes , 2004 .

[23]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[24]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[26]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Spatial estimation of air temperature differences for landscape-scale studies in montane environments , 2003 .

[27]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[28]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[29]  S. Suárez‐Seoane,et al.  Large-scale habitat selection by agricultural steppe birds in Spain: identifying species–habitat responses using generalized additive models , 2002 .

[30]  W. Kunin,et al.  Are Alaskan trees found in locally more favourable sites in marginal areas , 2002 .

[31]  L. Conradt,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins , 2001 .

[32]  G. Meehl,et al.  Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. , 2000, Science.

[33]  Laerte Guimarães Ferreira,et al.  Predicting Soil Albedo from Soil Color and Spectral Reflectance Data , 2000 .

[34]  R. Clarke,et al.  Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range , 1999 .

[35]  C. Thomas,et al.  Catastrophic Extinction of Population Sources in a Butterfly Metapopulation , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[36]  M. Luff,et al.  Cold-hardiness of wolf-spiders (lycosidae, araneae) with particular reference to Pardosa pullata (clerck) , 1993 .

[37]  J. Thomas Holocene climate changes and warm man‐made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early‐successional habitats , 1993 .

[38]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Sun, slope, and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha , 1988 .

[39]  J. Thomas,et al.  The Ecology and Conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Britain , 1983 .

[40]  Yan Zl,et al.  MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODELS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF HELIANTHEMUM CHAMAECISTUS IN RELATION TO ASPECT AND SLOPE AT BARNACK, ENGLAND , 1982 .

[41]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables , 1981, Vegetatio.

[42]  N. J. Rosenberg,et al.  Microclimate: The Biological Environment. , 1976 .

[43]  C. D. Pigott Cirsium Acaulon (L.) Scop. , 1968 .

[44]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[45]  R. Merrill,et al.  Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[46]  C. Thomas,et al.  Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[47]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint , 2003 .

[48]  O. Kindvall The impact of extreme weather on habitat preference and survival in a metapopulation of the bush cricket Metrioptera bicolor in Sweden , 1995 .

[49]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Correlates of speed of evolution of host preference in a set of twelve populations of the butterfly Euphydryas editha , 1994 .

[50]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  The Climate Near the Ground , 1965 .