Design Earthquakes and Conditional Hazard

Disaggregating seismic hazard in terms of some ground motion or source parameters as magnitude and distance to the site of interest, allows to identify the earthquakes giving the largest contribution to the occurrence or exceedance of a specific value of a ground motion intensity measure (IM). If mapped, such information may be of useful to engineers in better defining the seismic threat for the structure of interest, for example in case of record selection for nonlinear seismic structural analysis. Because disaggregation results change with the spectral ordinate and return period, and more than a single event may dominate the hazard, the issues related to mapping design earthquakes (DE) are discussed in the paper with respect to Italy. Secondly, it is shown how DEs may be useful in rapidly determining conditional hazard of a secondary ground motion intensity measure with respect to a primary IM. As shown by the application for a vector comprised of peak ground acceleration as the primary IM and the Cosenza and Manfredi Index as the secondary IM, conditional hazard may be used for a more refined and consistent definition of design seismic actions on structures. The conditional hazard approach may be applied, in principle, to any other vector of IMs, providing the advantages of vector-valued hazard analysis requiring much less effort, and therefore rendering it ready for implementation in practice.

[1]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  J. Douglas,et al.  Internet site for European strong-motion data , 2004 .

[3]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[4]  P. Bazzurro,et al.  Disaggregation of Probabilistic Ground-Motion Hazard in Italy , 2009 .

[5]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[6]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Importance of Mapping Design Earthquakes: Insights for the Southern Apennines, Italy , 2009 .

[7]  G. Manfredi Evaluation of seismic energy demand , 2001 .

[8]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[9]  I. Iervolino,et al.  Eurocode 8 Compliant Real Record Sets for Seismic Analysis of Structures , 2008 .

[10]  K. V. Mardia,et al.  Mardia's Test of Multinormality , 2004 .

[11]  C. Cornell,et al.  Record Selection for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Structures , 2005 .

[12]  Antonio Pugliese,et al.  Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from italian strong-motion records , 1987 .

[13]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Conditional Hazard Maps for Secondary Intensity Measures , 2010 .

[14]  I. Iervolino,et al.  Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation , 2011 .

[15]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector‐valued intensity measures , 2007 .

[16]  Massimiliano Stucchi,et al.  A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory , 2008 .

[17]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response , 2006 .