Effects of hydrophobic agent content in macro-porous substrates on the fracture behavior of the gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Abstract Although the adhesion between the macro-porous substrate (MPS) and micro-porous layer (MPL) of a gas diffusion layer (GDL) is a critical factor that affects the reliability and durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, systematic studies quantifying the interfacial fracture energy of GDL have not yet been reported. Therefore, in this study, the interfacial fracture energy of GDLs with different contents of hydrophobic agents in the MPS is quantitatively measured. GDL samples with 0, 5, 10, and 20 wt% of hydrophobic agent content are tested using double cantilever beam fracture mechanics tests. It is observed that the interfacial fracture energy of the GDLs increases as the content of hydrophobic agent increases, due to more favorable interactions between the hydrophobic agents of the MPL and MPS. Optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope analyses are performed on the bare and delaminated surfaces in order to investigate the mechanism of the interfacial fracture energy increase of the GDLs.

[1]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of the gas diffusion-layer parameters on cell performance of PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[2]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  Gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells—A review , 2009 .

[3]  Jong-Won Lee,et al.  Effect of PTFE content in microporous layer on water management in PEM fuel cells , 2008 .

[4]  Mark Pritzker,et al.  On the role of the microporous layer in PEMFC operation , 2009 .

[5]  Tae-Hee Lee,et al.  A study on the characteristics of the diffusion layer thickness and porosity of the PEMFC , 2004 .

[6]  A. John Appleby,et al.  Recent progress in performance improvement of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) , 2002 .

[7]  R. Dauskardt,et al.  Tuning depth profiles of organosilicate films with ultraviolet curing , 2008 .

[8]  Jiujun Zhang,et al.  Micro-porous layer with composite carbon black for PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[9]  Jong-Won Lee,et al.  A review of gas diffusion layer in PEM fuel cells: Materials and designs , 2012 .

[10]  Bo Ki Hong,et al.  Influence of anisotropic bending stiffness of gas diffusion layers on the electrochemical performanc , 2010 .

[11]  David Blackwell,et al.  Water flow in the gas diffusion layer of PEM fuel cells , 2005 .

[12]  R. Dauskardt,et al.  Contamination and moisture absorption effects on the mechanical properties of catalyst coated membranes in PEM fuel cells , 2012 .

[13]  B. Cho,et al.  Direct measurement of adhesion energy of monolayer graphene as-grown on copper and its application to renewable transfer process. , 2012, Nano letters.

[14]  Reinhold H Dauskardt,et al.  Mechanical properties of human stratum corneum: effects of temperature, hydration, and chemical treatment. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[15]  Andrew Higier,et al.  Effect of gas diffusion layer compression on PEM fuel cell performance , 2006 .

[16]  Zhigang Qi,et al.  Improvement of water management by a microporous sublayer for PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[17]  Bo Ki Hong,et al.  Influence of anisotropic bending stiffness of gas diffusion layers on the degradation behavior of po , 2011 .

[18]  R. Dauskardt,et al.  Graded delamination behavior of human stratum corneum. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[19]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Interlayer adhesion in roll-to-roll processed flexible inverted polymer solar cells , 2012 .

[20]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of fabrication processes and material parameters of GDL on cell performance of PEM fuel cell , 2007 .

[21]  Matthew M. Mench,et al.  Physical degradation of membrane electrode assemblies undergoing freeze/thaw cycling: Diffusion media effects , 2008 .

[22]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Liquid Water Transport in Gas Diffusion Layer of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2004 .

[23]  I. Park,et al.  Interfacial toughening of solution processed Ag nanoparticle thin films by organic residuals , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[24]  Robert J. Hohlfelder,et al.  Adhesion of benzocyclobutene-passivated silicon in epoxy layered structures , 2001 .

[25]  D. Curtin,et al.  Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life , 2004 .

[26]  A. Morin,et al.  Characterization of PEMFCs gas diffusion layers properties , 2006 .

[27]  R. Dauskardt,et al.  Surfactant-controlled damage evolution during chemical mechanical planarization of nanoporous films , 2009 .

[28]  Tse-Hao Ko,et al.  Effect of hydrophobic gas diffusion layers on the performance of the polymer exchange membrane fuel cell , 2009 .

[29]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Characteristics of the PEMFC Repetitively Brought to Temperatures below 0°C , 2003 .

[30]  D. Ingham,et al.  Effect of polytetrafluoroethylene-treatment and microporous layer-coating on the electrical conductivity of gas diffusion layers used in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2010 .

[31]  David A. Dillard,et al.  Fatigue and creep to leak tests of proton exchange membranes using pressure-loaded blisters , 2009 .

[32]  M. F. Kanninen,et al.  An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest , 1973, International Journal of Fracture.

[33]  Walter Mérida,et al.  Gas diffusion layer durability under steady-state and freezing conditions , 2007 .