Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special?

Do the operating characteristics of memory continue to bear the imprints of ancestral selection pressures? Previous work in our laboratory has shown that human memory may be specially tuned to retain information processed in terms of its survival relevance. A few seconds of survival processing in an incidental learning context can produce recall levels greater than most, if not all, known encoding procedures. The current experiments further establish the power of survival processing by demonstrating survival processing advantages against an encoding procedure requiring a combination of individual-item and relational processing. Participants were asked to make either survival relevance decisions or pleasantness ratings about words in the same categorized list. Survival processing produced the best recall, despite the fact that pleasantness ratings of words in a categorized list has long been considered a ‘‘gold standard” for enhancing free recall. The results also help to rule out conventional interpretations of the survival advantage that appeal to enhanced relational or categorical processing.

[1]  A. Healy Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications , 2005 .

[2]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Modeling Distinctiveness: Implications for General Memory Theory , 2006 .

[3]  The Functionalist Agenda in Memory Research. , 2005 .

[4]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy. , 1998, Memory.

[5]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[6]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  D. J. Burns,et al.  Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. , 1993 .

[8]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[9]  Y. Weinstein,et al.  Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[10]  William F. Battig,et al.  Effects of different kinds of semantic processing on memory for words , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[11]  R. Hunt,et al.  Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Evolution of Multiple Memory Systems , 1987 .

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[14]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Adaptive Memory The Comparative Value of Survival Processing , 2022 .

[15]  R. Hastie,et al.  Inhibition effects of intralist repetition in free recall , 1972 .

[16]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[17]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Do people differentially remember cheaters? , 2006, Human nature.

[18]  H. Barrett,et al.  Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. , 2006, Psychological review.

[19]  K. McDermott,et al.  The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[20]  J. Worthen,et al.  Distinctiveness and memory. , 2006 .

[21]  D. J. Burns,et al.  Assessing Distinctiveness: Measures of Item-Specific and Relational Processing , 2006 .

[22]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[23]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Adaptive Memory Remembering With a Stone-Age Brain , 2022 .

[24]  R. Hunt,et al.  Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. , 1984 .

[25]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[26]  A. Buchner,et al.  No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters , 2008 .

[27]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[28]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  N. Mulligan,et al.  The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[32]  A. Schulman Memory for words recently classified , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[33]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[34]  Edward L. Bennett,et al.  Neural mechanisms of learning and memory , 1977 .

[35]  P. Andrews,et al.  Adaptationism – how to carry out an exaptationist program , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  N. Mulligan Generation and hypermnesia. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Positional uncertainty in long-term memory , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[39]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Decisions and the evolution of memory: multiple systems, multiple functions. , 2002, Psychological review.

[40]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[41]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[42]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[43]  S. Klein,et al.  The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. , 1988 .

[44]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .