Interruptibility Estimation Based on Head Motion and PC Operation

Frequent and uncontrolled interruptions by information systems that do not reflect the user’s state can result in fragmented working times and decreased intellectual productivity. To avoid adverse interruptions, interruptibility estimation methods based on PC operation information have been proposed. However, workers who use PCs to accomplish their primary tasks occasionally engage in paperwork. Occasional paperwork activities, which are not reflected in the PC’s operation information, can cause estimation errors. This study focuses on using the position of the head, posture, temporal motion, and continuity of the head position and posture while a worker is at his or her desk as indices to reflect engagement in the task at hand. Based on an analysis of the relationship between the head-related parameters and interruptibility, an interruptibility estimation algorithm is proposed using four head-related indices that reflect interruptibility during PC and non-PC work. Experiments indicate that estimation accuracy improves as a result of incorporating these indices in the algorithm.

[1]  Daniel McDuff,et al.  AffectAura: an intelligent system for emotional memory , 2012, CHI.

[2]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments , 2005, ACM Multimedia.

[3]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Multitasking and monotasking: the effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions , 2010, CHI.

[4]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Towards a Physiological Model of User Interruptability , 2007, INTERACT.

[6]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[7]  Yutaka Matsushita,et al.  Design and Analysis of Social Interaction in Virtual Meeting Space , 2001 .

[8]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Heavy Users of Electronic Mail , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Gloria Mark,et al.  The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress , 2008, CHI.

[10]  Víctor M. González,et al.  No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work , 2005, CHI.

[11]  N. Taatgen,et al.  The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Takahiro Tanaka,et al.  Resumption lag at interruptible timing might not be short in actual environment , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption , 2006, CHI.

[14]  Karen Renaud,et al.  "You've Got E-Mail!" ... Shall I Deal With It Now? Electronic Mail From the Recipient's Perspective , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[16]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Dario D. Salvucci On reconstruction of task context after interruption , 2010, CHI.

[18]  Takahiro Tanaka,et al.  Study of User Uninterruptibility Estimation based on focused Application-Switching , 2010 .

[19]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Rainer Stiefelhagen,et al.  A context-aware virtual secretary in a smart office environment , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[21]  藤田 欣也,et al.  Study of Uninterruptibility Estimation Method for Office Worker during PC Work , 2012 .

[22]  Allen E. Milewski Interruption Management and Telephone Call Screening , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..