Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans

Two different types of steep loudness growth have been reported in detail in psychoacoustical studies but have rarely been evaluated by objective methods in humans. One occurs in inner-ear hearing-impaired patients and is known as loudness recruitment. Another similar phenomenon is observed in healthy subjects with concurrent presence of background noise. Concerning the first type, our previous study using magnetoencephalography (MEG) showed that enhancement of the dipole moment of N100m with increase in stimulus intensity was greater in patients than in normal individuals. However, it is unclear whether the enhancement of activity in auditory cortex will also be detected with background noise in healthy subjects. To elucidate the effects of continuous background noise on tone-evoked cortical activity, we measured auditory-evoked magnetic fields (AEFs) from 7 normal-hearing subjects in two different conditions, with and without 55 dB SPL continuous masking white noise (noise/quiet conditions). The stimuli were 200 ms 1-kHz tones delivered monaurally and randomly at 4 different intensities (40-70 dB SPL) with constant 1-s interstimulus intervals. The N100m increased in amplitude and decreased in latency as a function of stimulus intensity in both noise and quiet conditions. The dipole moment of N100m was significantly smaller in the noise than in the quiet condition, showing that continuous background noise suppresses the strength of tone-evoked cortical responses. The mechanisms underlying these two psychoacoustically similar phenomena of rapid loudness growth thus differ.

[1]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Some neural mechanisms in the cat's auditory cortex underlying sensitivity to combined tone and wide-spectrum noise stimuli , 1985, Hearing Research.

[2]  N. Fujiki,et al.  Enhanced activation of the auditory cortex in patients with inner-ear hearing impairment: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  D. P. Phillips.  Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Harold F. Schuknecht,et al.  Pathology of the Ear , 1974 .

[5]  J. Kaas,et al.  Injury-induced reorganization of somatosensory cortex is accompanied by reductions in GABA staining. , 1991, Somatosensory & motor research.

[6]  D. P. Phillips.  Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Loudness functions under inhibition , 1967 .

[8]  E. Young,et al.  Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Burkard,et al.  A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults. , 2002, American journal of audiology.

[10]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[11]  Maija S. Peltola,et al.  Contralateral White Noise Masking Affects Auditory N1 and P2 Waves Differently , 2003 .

[12]  M S Hämäläinen,et al.  Effects of intensity variation on human auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  R. Dykes,et al.  Quantitative study of glutamic acid decarboxylase‐immunoreactive neurons and cytochrome oxidase activity in normal and partially deafferented rat hindlimb somatosensory cortex , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Reduction in number of immunostained GABAergic neurones in deprived-eye dominance columns of monkey area 17 , 1986, Nature.

[16]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Rajan,et al.  Receptor organ damage causes loss of cortical surround inhibition without topographic map plasticity , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Robert Burkard,et al.  Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain , 2000, Hearing Research.

[19]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Loudness Function of a 1000‐cps Tone in the Presence of a Masking Noise , 1964 .

[21]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Human cortical representation of virtual auditory space: differences between sound azimuth and elevation , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  W O Olsen,et al.  Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. , 1975, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[23]  M. Watanabe,et al.  The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Jian Wang,et al.  Auditory plasticity and hyperactivity following cochlear damage , 2000, Hearing Research.

[26]  G. M. Gerken.  Alteration of central auditory processing of brief stimuli: a review and a neural model. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C. Elberling,et al.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity. , 1981, Scandinavian Audiology.

[28]  E. Welker,et al.  Plasticity in the barrel cortex of the adult mouse: Effects of peripheral deprivation on GAD-immunoreactivity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  H. Davis,et al.  Relations of the human vertex potential to acoustic input: loudness and masking. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Jian Wang,et al.  Functional reorganization in chinchilla inferior colliculus associated with chronic and acute cochlear damage , 2002, Hearing Research.