The standardization approach to assessing differential item functioning (DIF), including standardized distractor analysis, is described. The results of studies conducted on Asian Americans, Hispanics (Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans), and Blacks on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) are described and then synthesized across studies. Where the groups were limited to include only examinees who spoke English as their best language, very few items across forms and ethnic groups exhibited large DIF. Major findings include evidence of differential speededness (where minority examinees did not complete SAT-Verbal sections at the same rate as White students with comparable SAT-Verbal scores) for Blacks and Hispanics and, when the item content is of special interest, advantages for the relevant ethnic group. In addition, homographs tend to disadvantage all three ethnic groups, but the effect of vertical relationships in analogy items are not as consistent. Although these findings are important in understanding DIF, they do not seem to account for all differences. Other variables related to DIF still need to be identified. Furthermore, these findings are seen as tentative until corroborated by studies using controlled data collection designs.
[1]
Carole A. Bleistein,et al.
FACTORS AFFECTING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING FOR BLACK EXAMINEES ON SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST ANALOGY ITEMS1
,
1987
.
[2]
J. Scheuneman.
A METHOD OF ASSESSING BIAS IN TEST ITEMS
,
1979
.
[3]
M. R. Novick,et al.
Equal Opportunity in Educational and Employment Selection.
,
1977
.
[4]
Neil J. Dorans,et al.
Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test.
,
1986
.
[5]
N. Dorans.
Two New Approaches to Assessing Differential Item Functioning: Standardization and the Mantel--Haenszel Method
,
1989
.
[6]
Language and Cultural Characteristics That Explain Differential Item Functioning for Hispanic Examinees on the Scholastic Aptitude Test
,
1988
.
[7]
Lawrence J. Stricker,et al.
Identifying Test Items That Perform Differentially in Population Subgroups: A Partial Correlation Index
,
1982
.
[8]
Neil J. Dorans,et al.
ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ON SAT AND TSWE FORMS ADMINISTERED IN DECEMBER 1977: AN APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH1
,
1983
.
[9]
Neil J. Dorans,et al.
THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING DIFFERENTIAL SPEEDEDNESS
,
1988
.